- What is Amphibian Species of the World?
- How to cite
- How to use
- Structure of the taxonomic records
- Running log of additions and corrections, 2024
- Logs of changes and additions, 2014–2023
- What is the right name?
- Curator's blog
- History of the project, 1980 to 2024
- Comments on amphibian taxonomy relating to versions 3.0 to 6.2 (2004 to 2024)
- Scientific Nomenclature and its Discontents: Comments by Frost on Rules and Philosophy of Taxonomy, Ranks, and Their Applications
- Contributors, online editions
- Contributors and reviewers for Amphibian Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (1985)
- Versions
- Museum abbreviations
- Links to useful amphibian systematic, conservation, collection management, informational, and/or regional sites
- Links to useful FREE library sites
- Copyright and terms of use
Hyperolius poweri Loveridge, 1938
Hyperolius poweri Loveridge, 1938, Proc. Biol. Soc. Washington, 51: 213. Holotype: MCZ 23110, by original designation. Type locality: "vicinity of the Umvoti River, near Stranger [= Stanger], [KwaZulu-]Natal, Union of South Africa".
Common Names
Power's Reed Frog (Channing, 2001, Amph. Cent. S. Afr.: 173).
Power's Long Reed Frog (Du Preez and Carruthers, 2017, Frogs S. Afr., Compl. Guide: 282).
Distribution
Southeastern coast of South Africa (northeasternmost East Cape Province and KwaZulu-Natal); expected in Eswatini and southernmost Mozambique.
Geographic Occurrence
Natural Resident: South Africa
Likely/Controversially Present: Eswatini, Mozambique
Endemic: South Africa
Comment
Removed from the synonymy of Hyperolius acuticeps (now considered a synonym of Hyperolius microps) by Pickersgill, 2007, Frog Search: 353, where it had been considered by Channing, Moyer, and Burger, 2002, Afr. Zool., 37: 95. Bishop, 2004, in Minter et al. (eds.), Atlas Frogs S. Afr. Lesotho and Swaziland: 136, Pickersgill, 2007, Frog Search: 350-353, and Du Preez and Carruthers, 2009, Compl. Guide Frogs S. Afr.: 240-241, provided accounts (as Hyperolus acuticeps in the sense of including Hyperolius poweri). See comments under Hyperolius microps (with reference to the literature of nominal Hyperolius acuticeps). Channing, Hillers, Lötters, Rödel, Schick, Conradie, Rödder, Mercurio, Wagner, Dehling, Du Preez, Kielgast, and Burger, 2013, Zootaxa, 3620: 335-336, provided an account and redelimited the species. Du Preez and Carruthers, 2017, Frogs S. Afr., Compl. Guide: 282–283, provided an account, including a polygon range map, photograph, identification features, adult and larval morphology, habitat, and call. Phaka, Netherlands, Kruger, and Du Preez, 2017, Bilingual Field Guide Frogs Zululand: 43, provided a photograph, Zululand regional map, and a brief account of life history and identification. Dehling and Sinsch, 2019, Zool. Anz., 280: 65–77, considered this to be in the Hyperolius nasutus group. Channing and Rödel, 2019, Field Guide Frogs & Other Amph. Afr.: 180–181, provided a brief account, photograph, and range map.
External links:
Please note: these links will take you to external websites not affiliated with the American Museum of Natural History. We are not responsible for their content.
- For access to general information see Wikipedia
- For additional sources of general information from other websites search Google
- For access to relevant technical literature search Google Scholar
- For images search CalPhoto Images and Google Images
- To search the NIH genetic sequence database, see GenBank
- For additional information see AmphibiaWeb report
- For information on conservation status and distribution see the IUCN Redlist
- For information on distribution, habitat, and conservation see the Map of Life
- For related information on conservation and images as well as observations see iNaturalist
- For access to available specimen data for this species, from over 350 scientific collections, go to Vertnet.