- What is Amphibian Species of the World?
- How to cite
- How to use
- Structure of the taxonomic records
- Running log of additions and corrections, 2024
- Logs of changes and additions, 2014–2023
- What is the right name?
- Curator's blog
- Amphibian Species of the World on social media
- History of the project, 1980 to 2024
- Comments on amphibian taxonomy relating to versions 3.0 to 6.2 (2004 to 2024)
- Scientific Nomenclature and its Discontents: Comments by Frost on Rules and Philosophy of Taxonomy, Ranks, and Their Applications
- Contributors, online editions
- Contributors and reviewers for Amphibian Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (1985)
- Versions
- Museum abbreviations
- Links to useful amphibian systematic, conservation, collection management, informational, and/or regional sites
- Links to useful FREE library sites
- Copyright and terms of use
Hyperolius pusillus (Cope, 1862)
Crumenifera pusilla Cope, 1862, Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia, 14: 343. Type(s): Not designated; ANSP 11323 is holotype according to Malnate, 1971, Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia, 123: 352. Type locality: "Umvoti", KwaZulu-Natal, Rep. South Africa. Given, apparently in error as "Umvoti, W. Africa" by Boulenger, 1882, Cat. Batr. Sal. Coll. Brit. Mus., Ed. 2: 127.
Hyperolius heuglini Steindachner, 1864, Verh. Zool. Bot. Ges. Wien, 14: 244. Type(s): NHMW 32923 tentatively listed as holotype by Tiedemann and Grillitsch, 2000 "1999", Herpetozoa, Wien, 12: 148. Type locality: Abyssinia [= Ethiopia]. Provisional synonymy with Hyperolius microps by Boulenger, 1882, Cat. Batr. Sal. Coll. Brit. Mus., Ed. 2: 127.
Rappia pusilla — Boulenger, 1882, Cat. Batr. Sal. Coll. Brit. Mus., Ed. 2: 127; Barbour, 1911, Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool., 54: 133.
Hyperolius pusillus — Noble, 1924, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., 49: 251, 328; Loveridge, 1936, Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool., 79: 407; Loveridge, 1953, Q. J. Florida Acad. Sci., 16: 147.
Hyperolius translucens Power, 1935, Proc. Zool. Soc. London, 1935: 339. Syntypes: MMK (2 specimens); BMNH records have 1947.2.11.29–39 (formerly 1934.10.8.8–10) as syntypes but this requires confirmation. Type locality: "Port St. Johns", Pondoland, Rep. South Africa. Synonymy by Loveridge, 1936, Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool., 79: 372; Loveridge, 1938, Proc. Biol. Soc. Washington, 51: 213–214; and Ohler and Frétey, 2014, J. E. Afr. Nat. Hist., 103: 87.
Hyperolius milnei Loveridge, 1935, Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool., 79: 18. Holotype: MCZ 20025, by original designation. Type locality: "Witu, Coast Province, Kenya Colony". Synonymy by Loveridge, 1942, Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool., 91: 379, 412.
Common Names
Translucent Tree Frog (Hewitt, 1937, Guide Vert. Fauna E. Cape Province, Rept. Amph. Fishes: 111; Passmore and Carruthers, 1978, J. Herpetol. Assoc. Afr., 19: 7; Passmore and Carruthers, 1979, S. Afr. Frogs: 250).
Transparent Pigmy Sedge Frog (Ananjeva, Borkin, Darevsky, and Orlov, 1988, Dict. Amph. Rept. Five Languages: 73).
Water Lily Frog (Pienaar, 1963, Koedoe, 6: 81; Wager, 1965, Frogs S. Afr.: 204; Broadley, 1973, J. Herpetol. Assoc. Afr., 10: 24; Passmore and Carruthers, 1978, J. Herpetol. Assoc. Afr., 19: 7; Broadley, 1978, J. Herpetol. Assoc. Afr., 19: 35; Passmore and Carruthers, 1979, S. Afr. Frogs: 250; Lambiris, 1990 "1989", Monogr. Mus. Reg. Sci. Nat. Torino, 10: 167; Du Preez and Carruthers, 2009, Compl. Guide Frogs S. Afr.: 262).
Water Lily Reed Frog (Channing and Howell, 2006, Amph. E. Afr.: 178).
Lily Pad Frog (Van Dijk, 1978, J. Herpetol. Assoc. Afr., 17: 16).
Dwarf Reed Frog (Frank and Ramus, 1995, Compl. Guide Scient. Common Names Amph. Rept. World: 68).
Water Lily Reed Frog (Channing, 2001, Amph. Cent. S. Afr.: 176).
Distribution
Open swamp vegetation of southernmost coastal Somalia south along coastal lowlands of Africa (Kenya, Tanzania, Mozambique) to extreme eastern Eastern Cape Province, Rep. South Africa; inland through Malawi and into Zimbabwe through the Zambesi Valley.
Geographic Occurrence
Natural Resident: Eswatini, Kenya, Malawi, Mozambique, Somalia, South Africa, Tanzania, Zimbabwe
Comment
Poynton and Broadley, 1987, Ann. Natal Mus., 28: 205, noted that Zambian records are referable to Hyperolius viridis. See brief taxonomic discussion of Poynton, 1964, Ann. Natal Mus., 17: 191–192, and accounts by Schiøtz, 1999, Treefrogs Afr.: 185–186, Channing, 2001, Amph. Cent. S. Afr.: 176–177, Channing and Howell, 2006, Amph. E. Afr.: 178–179, Alexander, 2004, in Minter et al. (eds.), Atlas Frogs S. Afr. Lesotho and Swaziland: 146–147, Pickersgill, 2007, Frog Search: 346–349 (who implied a cryptic species exists in Malawi), and Du Preez and Carruthers, 2009, Compl. Guide Frogs S. Afr.: 262–263. Mercurio, 2011, Amph. Malawi: 183–185, provided an account for Malawi. Channing, Rödel, and Channing, 2012, Tadpoles of Africa: 220–221, discussed comparative larval morphology. Harper, Measey, Patrick, Menegon, and Vonesh, 2010, Field Guide Amph. E. Arc Mts. Tanzania and Kenya: 198–199, provided a brief account and photograph. Marques, Ceríaco, Blackburn, and Bauer, 2018, Proc. California Acad. Sci., Ser. 4, 65 (Suppl. II): 111–112, provided a map for Angola and a brief account, noting that the Angolan specimens needed to be reviewed and also implied that the records likely were misidentifications. Phaka, Netherlands, Kruger, and Du Preez, 2017, Bilingual Field Guide Frogs Zululand: 44, provided a photograph, Zululand regional map, and a brief account of life history and identification. Spawls, Wasonga, and Drewes, 2019, Amph. Kenya: 23, provided a range map for Kenya, photograph, and brief characterization. See Hyperolius albofrenatus which is a likely synonym.
External links:
Please note: these links will take you to external websites not affiliated with the American Museum of Natural History. We are not responsible for their content.
- For access to general information see Wikipedia
- For additional sources of general information from other websites search Google
- For access to relevant technical literature search Google Scholar
- For images search CalPhoto Images and Google Images
- To search the NIH genetic sequence database, see GenBank
- For additional information see AmphibiaWeb report
- For information on conservation status and distribution see the IUCN Redlist
- For information on distribution, habitat, and conservation see the Map of Life
- For related information on conservation and images as well as observations see iNaturalist
- For access to available specimen data for this species, from over 350 scientific collections, go to Vertnet.