- What is Amphibian Species of the World?
- How to cite
- How to use
- Structure of the taxonomic records
- Running log of additions and changes, 2025
- Logs of changes and additions, 2014–2024
- What is the right name?
- Curator's blog
- History of the project, 1980 to 2024
- Comments on amphibian taxonomy relating to versions 3.0 to 6.2 (2004 to 2024)
- Scientific Nomenclature and its Discontents: Comments by Frost on Rules and Philosophy of Taxonomy, Ranks, and Their Applications
- Contributors, online editions
- Contributors and reviewers for Amphibian Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (1985)
- Versions
- Museum abbreviations
- Links to useful amphibian systematic, conservation, collection management, informational, and/or regional sites
- Links to useful FREE library sites
- Copyright and terms of use
Hydrolaetare schmidti (Cochran and Goin, 1959)
Limnomedusa schmidti Cochran and Goin, 1959, Copeia, 1959: 208. Holotype: USNM 140245, by original designation. Type locality: "near Leticia, Amazonas Comisaria, Colombia".
Hydrolaetare schmidti — Gallardo, 1963, Neotropica, 9: 46.
Common Names
Schmidt's Forest Frog (Frank and Ramus, 1995, Compl. Guide Scient. Common Names Amph. Rept. World: 81).
Distribution
Spotty distribution in Amazon basin in Brazil from the Madeira region to Amapá, Brazil, Amazonian Colombia, northeastern Peru, northern Bolivia, and northeastern French Guiana; expected in southeastern Surinam and southern French Guiana.
Geographic Occurrence
Natural Resident: Bolivia, Brazil, Colombia, French Guiana, Peru
Comment
See redescription by Gallardo, 1963, Neotropica, 9: 42-48. Rodríguez and Duellman, 1994, Univ. Kansas Mus. Nat. Hist. Spec. Publ., 22: 65–66, provided a brief account for the Iquitos region of northeastern Peru. De la Riva, Köhler, Lötters, and Reichle, 2000, Rev. Esp. Herpetol., 14: 57, and Köhler, 2000, Bonn. Zool. Monogr., 48: 69, consider this species possibly to occur in Bolivia. Lescure and Marty, 2000, Collect. Patrimoines Nat., Paris, 45: 228-229, provided a photo and brief account for French Guiana. Padial and De la Riva, 2005, Herpetozoa, Wien, 18: 65-67, provided a record for Bolivia. Lynch, 2005, Rev. Acad. Colomb. Cienc. Exact. Fis. Nat., 29: 58-588, reported this species from Leticia, Colombia. Ferrão, Fraga, Simões, and Lima, 2014, Salamandra, 50: 77–84, discussed the range and habitat. Lima, Lima, Sousa, Oliveira, and Costa-Campos, 2019, Check List, 15: 815–819, provided records from Amapá, Brazil, and discussed the known range of the species. Metcalf, Marsh, Torres Pacaya, Graham, and Gunnels, 2020, Herpetol. Notes, 13: 753–767, reported the species from the Santa Cruz Forest Reserve, Loreto, northeastern Peru. Taucce, Costa-Campos, Carvalho, and Michalski, 2022, Eur. J. Taxon., 836: 96–130, reported on distribution, literature, and conservation status for Amapá, Brazil. Vilela, Costa-Campos, Sousa, and Carvalho, 2024, Zootaxa, 5538: 497–500, reported on defensive and reproductive calls.
External links:
Please note: these links will take you to external websites not affiliated with the American Museum of Natural History. We are not responsible for their content.
- For access to general information see Wikipedia
- For additional sources of general information from other websites search Google
- For access to relevant technical literature search Google Scholar
- For images search CalPhoto Images and Google Images
- To search the NIH genetic sequence database, see GenBank
- For additional information see AmphibiaWeb report
- For information on conservation status and distribution see the IUCN Redlist
- For information on distribution, habitat, and conservation see the Map of Life
- For related information on conservation and images as well as observations see iNaturalist
- For access to available specimen data for this species, from over 350 scientific collections, go to Vertnet.