- What is Amphibian Species of the World?
- How to cite
- How to use
- Structure of the taxonomic records
- Newly described species, changes, and additions, 2026
- Logs of changes and additions, 2014–2025
- What is the right name?
- Curator's blog
- History of the project, 1980 to 2024
- Comments on amphibian taxonomy relating to versions 3.0 to 6.2 (2004 to 2024)
- Scientific Nomenclature and its Discontents: Comments by Frost on Rules and Philosophy of Taxonomy, Ranks, and Their Applications
- Contributors, online editions
- Contributors and reviewers for Amphibian Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (1985)
- Versions
- Museum abbreviations
- Links to useful amphibian systematic, conservation, collection management, informational, and/or regional sites
- Links to useful FREE library sites
- Copyright and terms of use
Austrochaperina Fry, 1912
Austrochaperina Fry, 1912, Rec. Aust. Mus., 9: 93. Type species: Austrochaperina robusta Fry, 1912, by original designation.
Common Names
None noted.
Distribution
Australia, New Guinea, and New Britain I.
Comment
Removed from the synonymy of Sphenophryne by Zweifel, 2000, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., 253: 9, where it had been placed by Nieden, 1926, Das Tierreich, 49: 50. Revision in Zweifel, 2000, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., 253: 1–130. Hoskin, 2004, Aust. J. Zool., 52: 240, provided a molecular tree of the Australian species. Köhler and Günther, 2008, Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 47: 353–365, suggested that Austrochaperina is not monophyletic, with each of two monophyletic units of "Austrochaperina" most closely related to pieces of an equally nonmonophyletic "Copiula". Hoskin, 2008, Mem. Queensland Mus., 52: 233–237, provided a key to the species of Australia. Pyron and Wiens, 2011, Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 61: 543–583, in their molecular study, did not refute this result due to decreased taxon sampling. Dubois, Ohler, and Pyron, 2021, Megataxa, 5: 418, placed Austrochaperina (as well as all other asterophryine genera other than Gastrophrynoides) into Asterophrys as a way of dealing with the non-monophyly of several of the genera. Among the terminals in their molecular study Australochaperina presented as polyphyletic, with Australochaperina robusta (the type species) being imbedded in Callulops and Australochaperina palmipes being in a distant clade along with Cophixalus sphagnicolus and Barygenys flavigularis. Portik, Streicher, and Wiens, 2023, Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 188 (107907): 66, suggested that this genus is polyphyletic, but did not include the type species in their analysis. Brennan, Hoskin, Richards, Lemmon, Lemmon, Donnellan, and Keogh, 2026, Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 224(108676): 1–9, also recovered Austrochaperina as polyphyletic, with four separate clades in their tree the clade containing the type species, Austrochaperina robusta, forming the sister taxon of Copiula guttata.
Contained taxa (29 sp.):
External links:
Please note: these links will take you to external websites not affiliated with the American Museum of Natural History. We are not responsible for their content.
- For access to general information see Wikipedia
- For additional sources of general information from other websites search Google
- For access to relevant technical literature search Google Scholar
- For images search CalPhoto Images and Google Images
- To search the NIH genetic sequence database, see GenBank