- What is Amphibian Species of the World?
- How to cite
- How to use
- Structure of the taxonomic records
- Running log of additions and changes, 2025
- Logs of changes and additions, 2014–2024
- What is the right name?
- Curator's blog
- History of the project, 1980 to 2024
- Comments on amphibian taxonomy relating to versions 3.0 to 6.2 (2004 to 2024)
- Scientific Nomenclature and its Discontents: Comments by Frost on Rules and Philosophy of Taxonomy, Ranks, and Their Applications
- Contributors, online editions
- Contributors and reviewers for Amphibian Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (1985)
- Versions
- Museum abbreviations
- Links to useful amphibian systematic, conservation, collection management, informational, and/or regional sites
- Links to useful FREE library sites
- Copyright and terms of use
Elachistocleis helianneae Caramaschi, 2010
Elachistocleis helianneae Caramaschi, 2010, Bol. Mus. Nac., Rio de Janeiro, N.S., Zool., 527: 5. Holotype: MNRJ 6989, by original designation. Type locality: "BRAZIL: AMAZONAS: Humaitá (07° 35′ S, 62° 40′ W; 90m altitude)".
Engystoma helianneae — Dubois, Ohler, and Pyron, 2021, Megataxa, 5: 216.
Common Names
None noted.
Distribution
Amazonian Brazil, in the States of Amazonas, Pará, Amapá, and Rondônia.
Geographic Occurrence
Natural Resident: Brazil
Endemic: Brazil
Comment
Fonseca, Lanna, Sant’Anna, Pereira Silva, Santos, Neves, and Mângia, 2012, Zootaxa, 3559: 58-60, reported on the advertisement call. Costa-Campos and Freire, 2015, Check List, 11 (no. 5, art. 1747): 1–3, provided a record for Amapa, Brazil, and mapped the known range. Zimmerman, 1983, Herpetologica, 39: 235–246, reported on advertisement call of what is likely this species, as Elachistocleis bicolor. See Marinho, Carvalho, Bang, Teixeira, Azarak, Costa-Campos, and Giaretta, 2018, Zootaxa, 4521: 357–375, for discussion of advertisement call, intraspecific variation, and diagnosis. Dias-Souza, Costa-Campos, and Menin, 2019, Zootaxa, 4701: 594–600, described larval morphology. Jowers, Othman, Borzée, Rivas-Fuenmayor, Sánchez-Ramírez, Auguste, Downie, Read, and Murphy, 2021, Organisms Divers. Evol., 21: 189–206, discussed the phylogenetics and biogeography of this species. Taucce, Costa-Campos, Carvalho, and Michalski, 2022, Eur. J. Taxon., 836: 96–130, reported on distribution, literature, and conservation status for Amapá, Brazil. Schiesari, Rossa-Feres, Menin, and Hödl, 2022, Zootaxa, 5223: 99–100, detailed larval morphology and natural history. Dias-Souza, Gama, Melo, Rebêlo, and Costa-Campos, 2022, Herpetol. Notes, 15: 1–11, provided a record from Santana I., Amapá, Brazil. In the Elachistocleis bicolor group of Novaes-e-Fagundes, Lyra, Loredam, Carvalho, Haddad, Rodrigues, Baldo, Barrasso, Loebmann, Ávila, Brusquetti, Prudente, Wheeler, Orrico, and Peloso, 2023, Zool. J. Linn. Soc., 197: 545–568, who provided a dot map that excluded Bolivia from the range.
External links:
Please note: these links will take you to external websites not affiliated with the American Museum of Natural History. We are not responsible for their content.
- For access to general information see Wikipedia
- For additional sources of general information from other websites search Google
- For access to relevant technical literature search Google Scholar
- For images search CalPhoto Images and Google Images
- To search the NIH genetic sequence database, see GenBank
- For additional information see AmphibiaWeb report
- For information on conservation status and distribution see the IUCN Redlist
- For information on distribution, habitat, and conservation see the Map of Life
- For related information on conservation and images as well as observations see iNaturalist