- What is Amphibian Species of the World?
- How to cite
- How to use
- Structure of the taxonomic records
- Running log of additions and changes, 2025
- Logs of changes and additions, 2014–2024
- What is the right name?
- Curator's blog
- History of the project, 1980 to 2024
- Comments on amphibian taxonomy relating to versions 3.0 to 6.2 (2004 to 2024)
- Scientific Nomenclature and its Discontents: Comments by Frost on Rules and Philosophy of Taxonomy, Ranks, and Their Applications
- Contributors, online editions
- Contributors and reviewers for Amphibian Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (1985)
- Versions
- Museum abbreviations
- Links to useful amphibian systematic, conservation, collection management, informational, and/or regional sites
- Links to useful FREE library sites
- Copyright and terms of use
Hypopachus ustus (Cope, 1866)
Engystoma ustum Cope, 1866, Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia, 18: 131. Holotype: USNM 24965 according to Kellogg, 1932, Bull. U.S. Natl. Mus., 160: 188; Cochran, 1961, Bull. U.S. Natl. Mus., 220: 48. Type locality: "Guadalaxara [= Guadalajara, Jalisco], West Mexico"; apparently in error, according to Nelson, 1972, J. Herpetol., 6: 119, who corrected the type locality to "Tecoman, Colima, Mexico".
Systoma ustum — Cope, 1867, J. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia, Ser. 2, 6: 194.
Engystoma mexicanum Peters, 1870 "1869", Monatsber. Preuss. Akad. Wiss. Berlin, 1869: 881. Holotype: ZMB 6667 according to Nelson, 1972, Herpetol. Rev., 4: 90, and Bauer, Günther, and Robeck, 1996, Mitt. Zool. Mus. Berlin, 72: 263. Type locality: "wareren Gegenden Mexicos (Matamoros u. a. o.)" (= warmer parts of Mexico (Matamoros and other areas); stated as "State of Puebla, Mexico" by Parker, 1934, Monogr. Frogs Fam. Microhylidae: 149; restricted to "[Izucar de] Matamoros, Puebla", Mexico, by Taylor and Smith, 1945, Proc. U.S. Natl. Mus., 95: 603, and Smith and Taylor, 1950, Univ. Kansas Sci. Bull., 33: 341; this restriction rejected by Nelson, 1972, Herpetol. Rev., 4: 90. Synonymy by Cope, 1871, Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia, 23: 216; Boulenger, 1882, Cat. Batr. Sal. Coll. Brit. Mus., Ed. 2: 161.
Eupemphix gadovii Boulenger, 1903, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., Ser. 7, 12: 552. Syntypes: Not stated; BMNH 1903.9.30.259–261 according to Kellogg, 1932, Bull. U.S. Natl. Mus., 160: 188; reregistered 1947.2.11.54–56 according to Nelson, 1972, Cat. Am. Amph. Rept., 123: 1. Type locality: "San Mateo del Mar", near Tehuantepec, Oaxaca, Mexico. Synonymy by Stejneger, 1910, Proc. Biol. Soc. Washington, 23: 165–168.
Gastrophryne usta — Stejneger, 1910, Proc. Biol. Soc. Washington, 23: 166.
Engystoma usta — Nieden, 1926, Das Tierreich, 49: 64.
Microhyla usta — Parker, 1934, Monogr. Frogs Fam. Microhylidae: 126.
Microhyla usta gadovii — Taylor and Smith, 1945, Proc. U.S. Natl. Mus., 95: 603.
Microhyla usta usta — Taylor and Smith, 1945, Proc. U.S. Natl. Mus., 95: 603.
Microhyla gadovii — Maldonado-Koerdell, 1953, in Beltrán (ed.), Vida Silvestre y Recursos Nat. Largo Carr. Panamericana: 117.
Gastrophryne usta usta — Carvalho, 1954, Occas. Pap. Mus. Zool. Univ. Michigan, 555: 13.
Gastrophryne usta gadovii — Carvalho, 1954, Occas. Pap. Mus. Zool. Univ. Michigan, 555: 13.
Gastrophryne usta gadowi — Duellman, 1960, Univ. Kansas Publ. Mus. Nat. Hist., 13: 67. Incorrect subsequent spelling.
Gastrophryne usta retifera Lynch, 1965, Trans. Kansas Acad. Sci., 68: 397. Holotype: UIMNH 20048, by original designation. Type locality: "near San Andres Tuxtla, Veracruz, Mexico". Status rejected by Nelson, 1972, J. Herpetol., 6: 122.
Hypopachus ustum — Streicher, Cox, Campbell, Smith, and de Sá, 2012, Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 64: 645–653. Incorrect gender of species name.
Hypopachus ustus — Frost, 2013, Amph. Spec. World, Vers. 5.6. Correction of gender.
Common Names
Two-spaded Narrowmouth Toad (Liner, 1994, Herpetol. Circ., 23: 22).
Two-spade Narrowmouth Toad (Frank and Ramus, 1995, Compl. Guide Scient. Common Names Amph. Rept. World: 89).
Two-spaded Narrow-mouthed Toad (Liner and Casas-Andreu, 2008, Herpetol. Circ., 38: 14).
Distribution
Central Sinaloa, the Balsas Depression, and central Veracruz to Chiapas (Mexico), Guatemala, and El Salvador on the Pacific versant.
Geographic Occurrence
Natural Resident: El Salvador, Guatemala, Mexico
Comment
Reviewed by Nelson, 1972, Cat. Am. Amph. Rept., 123: 1–2 (as Gastrophryne usta). Published records for elevations above 1000 m and those for the Lerma-Chapala drainage system are apparently spurious, as discussed by Nelson, 1972, J. Herpetol., 6: 118–119 (as Gastrophryne usta), who also provided details of distribution. Subspecies suggested, most recently by Lynch, 1965, Trans. Kansas Acad. Sci., 68: 396–400, rejected by Nelson, 1972, J. Herpetol., 6: 122. Valenzuela Galván, Chávez-Juárez, and Alcaraz-Cruz, 2004, Herpetol. Rev., 35: 184, provided the Morelos, Mexico, record. Köhler, Veselý, and Greenbaum, 2005 "2006", Amph. Rept. El Salvador: 62–63, provided an account (for El Salvador; as Gastrophryne usta) and a color photograph. Köhler, 2011, Amph. Cent. Am.: 285–286, provided a brief summary of natural history and provided a range map and photograph for this species (as Gastrophryne usta). Castro-Bastidas, Barraza-Herrera, Barreras-Gaxiola, and Loc-Barragán, 2023, Rev. Latinoam. Herpetol., 106: 36–38, reported specimens from Sinaloa (Municipality of Escuinapa), Mexico, the first in over 40 years. Loc-Barragán, Smith, Woolrich-Piña, and Lemos-Espinal, 2024, Herpetozoa, Wien, 37: 30, reported on the distributional and conservation status in the state of Nayarit, Mexico.
External links:
Please note: these links will take you to external websites not affiliated with the American Museum of Natural History. We are not responsible for their content.
- For access to general information see Wikipedia
- For additional sources of general information from other websites search Google
- For access to relevant technical literature search Google Scholar
- For images search CalPhoto Images and Google Images
- To search the NIH genetic sequence database, see GenBank
- For additional information see AmphibiaWeb report
- For information on conservation status and distribution see the IUCN Redlist
- For information on distribution, habitat, and conservation see the Map of Life
- For related information on conservation and images as well as observations see iNaturalist