- What is Amphibian Species of the World?
- How to cite
- How to use
- Structure of the taxonomic records
- Running log of additions and changes, 2025
- Logs of changes and additions, 2014–2024
- What is the right name?
- Curator's blog
- History of the project, 1980 to 2024
- Comments on amphibian taxonomy relating to versions 3.0 to 6.2 (2004 to 2024)
- Scientific Nomenclature and its Discontents: Comments by Frost on Rules and Philosophy of Taxonomy, Ranks, and Their Applications
- Contributors, online editions
- Contributors and reviewers for Amphibian Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (1985)
- Versions
- Museum abbreviations
- Links to useful amphibian systematic, conservation, collection management, informational, and/or regional sites
- Links to useful FREE library sites
- Copyright and terms of use
Microhyla berdmorei (Blyth, 1856)
Engystoma (?) berdmorei Blyth, 1856 "1855", J. Asiat. Soc. Bengal, 24: 720. Type(s): Not stated; ZSIC 9718–20 are syntypes according to Sclater, 1892, List Batr. Indian Mus.: 23, although Blyth provides measurements for a single specimen. Garg, Suyesh, Das, Jiang, Wijayathilaka, Amarasinghe, Alhadi, Vineeth, Aravind, Senevirathne, Meegaskumbura, and Biju, 2018 "2019", Vert. Zool., Senckenberg, 69: 15, discussed the confusing status of types and noted that ZSI 9718–9720 (from Arakan, Myanmar, largely match the original description. Type locality: "Pegu" (= Bago), Myanmar; given as "Schwe Gyen" (= Shwegyin) on the Sitang River, Pegu [= Bago]", Myanmar by Blyth, 1856 "1855", J. Asiat. Soc. Bengal, 24: 711.
Callula natatrix Cope, 1867, J. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia, Ser. 2, 6: 192. Syntypes: MCZ 630, according to original publication; MCZ 1587 (5 specimens, apparently renumbered as MCZ A-153454–57), according to Barbour and Loveridge, 1929, Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool., 69: 235). Type locality: "Near Rangoon, Burmah". Synonymy by Günther, 1868, Zool. Rec., 4: 146; Boulenger, 1882, Cat. Batr. Sal. Coll. Brit. Mus., Ed. 2: 166; Bourret, 1942, Batr. Indochine: 509.
Diplopelma (Engystoma) berdmorei — Günther, 1868, Zool. Rec., 4: 146.
Diplopelma berdmorei — Theobald, 1873, Proc. Asiat. Soc. Bengal, 1873: 112.
Microhyla (Engystoma) berdmorei — Mason, 1882, Burma, Ed. 3: 292.
Microhyla berdmorii — Boulenger, 1882, Cat. Batr. Sal. Coll. Brit. Mus., Ed. 2: 166. Incorrect subsequent spelling.
Microhyla (Engystoma) berdmorei —Boulenger In Mason, 1882, Burma, Ed. 3: 500.
Microhyla berdmorei — Parker, 1934, Monogr. Frogs Fam. Microhylidae: 127.
Microhyla (Microhyla) bermorei — Dubois, 1987, Alytes, 6: 3.
Common Names
Berdmore's Narrow-mouthed Frog (Das and Dutta, 1998, Hamadryad, 23: 64; Zug, 2022, Smithson. Contrib. Zool., 653: 30.
Pegu Rice Frog (Frank and Ramus, 1995, Compl. Guide Scient. Common Names Amph. Rept. World: 90).
Burmese Microhylid Frog (Chanda, 2002, Handb. Indian Amph.: 36; Neang and Holden, 2008, Field Guide Amph. Cambodia: 63).
Berdmore's Chorus Frog (Chan-ard, 2003, Photograph. Guide Amph. Thailand: 102; Dinesh, Radhakrishnan, Gururaja, and Bhatta, 2009, Rec. Zool. Surv. India, Occas. Pap., 302: 53; Dinesh, Radhakrishnan, Deepak, and Kulkarni, 2023, Fauna India Checklist, vers. 5.0 : 7).
Distribution
India (northeastern part of the country: Arunachal Pradesh, Meghalaya, Assam, Tripura, and Mizoram states), Bangladesh (central, northeastern, and southeastern parts of the country), and Myanmar (northwestern and central parts of the country); older records from outside of this region apply to other members of the Microhyla berdmorei complex.
Geographic Occurrence
Natural Resident: Bangladesh, India, Myanmar
Likely/Controversially Present: Cambodia, China, People's Republic of, Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia, Malaysia, East (Sarawak and/or Sabah), Malaysia, West (Peninsular), Thailand, Vietnam
Comment
Trofimets, Dufresnes, Pawangkhanant, Bragin, Gorin, Hasan, Lalremsanga, Muin, Le, Nguyen, Suwannapoom, and Poyarkov, 2024, Vert. Zool., Senckenberg, 74: 595–641, revised the Microhyla berdmorei complex, on the basis of comparative adult and larval morphology, morphometrics, advertisement calls, and molecular markers, partitioning it into several species (i.e., Microhyla berdmorei (under a restricted definition), Microhyla malcolmi, Microhyla peninsularis, and Microhyla sundaica), requiring that literature of nominal "Microhyla berdmorei" prior to this revision be used with caution. This revision also details the older literature and should be consulted to understand what taxon the various authors were actually referencing under the name Microhyla berdmorei. Gorin, Solovyeva, Hasan, Okamiya, Karunarathna, Pawangkhanant, de Silva, Juthong, Milto, Nguyen, Suwannapoom, Haas, Bickford, Das, and Poyarkov, 2020, PeerJ, 8 (e9411): 1–47, and Kundu, Lalremsanga, Biakzuala, Decemson, Muansanga, Tyagi, Chandra, and Kumar, 2021, MtDNA, Part B, 6: 1586–1591, had previously provided molecular evidence that nominal Microhyla berdmorei (as then recognized) is a complex of cryptic species.
Choudhury, Hussain, Buruah, Saikia, and Sengupta, 2002, Hamadryad, 26: 277, Dutta, 1997, Amph. India Sri Lanka: 58–59, Chanda, 2002, Handb. Indian Amph.: 36–39, and Sarkar and Ray, 2006, In Alfred (ed.), Fauna of Arunachal Pradesh, Part 1: 291, provided accounts for the Indian component of the range. Devi and Shamungou, 2006, J. Exp. Zool. India, 9: 317–324, provided a record for Manipur, northeastern India. Das and Dutta, 2007, Hamadryad, 31: 154–181, noted several larval descriptions in the literature of varying completeness. Mahony, 2008, Hamadryad, 32: 34–45, reported a tentatively identified specimen from the Chittagong Hill Tract, Bangladesh, that he assumed would ultimately be named as a new species also occurring in adjacent northeastern India. Mathew and Sen, 2010, Pict. Guide Amph. NE India: 65–66, provided a brief characterization and photographs. Mahony, Hasan, Kabir, Ahmed, and Hossain, 2009, Hamadryad, 34: 80–94, discussed the vouchered range in Bangladesh. Hasan, Islam, Khan, Alam, Kurabayashi, Igawa, Kuramoto, and Sumida, 2012, Zool. Sci., Tokyo, 29: 162–172, suggested on the basis of molecular evidence that samples from Bangladesh represents an unnamed species. Ahmad and Mim, 2020, IRCF Rept. & Amph., 27: 36–41, reported specimens from the Bandarban District, southeastern Bangladesh. See comments by Hakim, Trageser, Ghose, Das, Rashid, and Rahman, 2020, Check List, 16: 1239–1268, who reported the species from Lawachara National Park, Sylhet Division, northeastern Bangladesh. Raj, Vasudevan, Aggarwal, Dutta, Sahoo, Mahapatra, Sharma, Janani, Kar, and Dubois, 2023, Alytes, 39–40: 57–61, reported on larval morphology of genetically-confirmed specimens from Mizoram, India. Stuart, Seateun, Sivongxay, and Phimmachak, 2025 "2024", in Wildlife Lao PDR: 36, summarized literature, taxonomy, habitat, and detailed range for Laos (in the sense of Microhyla berdmorei prior to the revision of Trofimets, Dufresnes, Pawangkhanant, Bragin, Gorin, Hasan, Lalremsanga, Muin, Le, Nguyen, Suwannapoom, and Poyarkov, 2024, Vert. Zool., Senckenberg, 74: 595–641.
External links:
Please note: these links will take you to external websites not affiliated with the American Museum of Natural History. We are not responsible for their content.
- For access to general information see Wikipedia
- For additional sources of general information from other websites search Google
- For access to relevant technical literature search Google Scholar
- For images search CalPhoto Images and Google Images
- To search the NIH genetic sequence database, see GenBank
- For additional information see AmphibiaWeb report
- For information on conservation status and distribution see the IUCN Redlist
- For information on distribution, habitat, and conservation see the Map of Life
- For related information on conservation and images as well as observations see iNaturalist
- For additional information specific to China see Amphibia China