- What is Amphibian Species of the World?
- How to cite
- How to use
- Structure of the taxonomic records
- Newly described species, changes, and additions, 2026
- Logs of changes and additions, 2014–2025
- What is the right name?
- Curator's blog
- History of the project, 1980 to 2024
- Comments on amphibian taxonomy relating to versions 3.0 to 6.2 (2004 to 2024)
- Scientific Nomenclature and its Discontents: Comments by Frost on Rules and Philosophy of Taxonomy, Ranks, and Their Applications
- Contributors, online editions
- Contributors and reviewers for Amphibian Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (1985)
- Versions
- Museum abbreviations
- Links to useful amphibian systematic, conservation, collection management, informational, and/or regional sites
- Links to useful FREE library sites
- Copyright and terms of use
Proceratophrys renalis (Miranda-Ribeiro, 1920)
Ceratophrys renalis Miranda-Ribeiro, 1920, Rev. Mus. Paulista, São Paulo, 12: 296. Syntypes: MZUSP, by original designation. Given as MZUSP 0932 and 56310 by Prado and Pombal, 2008, Arq. Zool., São Paulo, 39: 39, who designated MZUSP 0932 as lectotype. Type locality: "Itabuna, Bahia", Brazil. Given as "Município de Itabuna (14°47’S, 39°16’W), Bahia, Brasil", by Prado and Pombal, 2008, Arq. Zool., São Paulo, 39: 39.
Stombus renalis — Miranda-Ribeiro, 1920, Rev. Mus. Paulista, São Paulo, 12: 302.
Proceratophrys renalis — Lynch, 1971, Misc. Publ. Mus. Nat. Hist. Univ. Kansas, 53: 134; Prado and Pombal, 2008, Arq. Zool., São Paulo, 39: 38.
Common Names
None noted.
Distribution
Coastal Ceara and Paraíba south through Pernambuco, Alagoas, Sergipe, and eastern Bahia to north-central Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Geographic Occurrence
Natural Resident: Brazil
Endemic: Brazil
Comment
Removed from the synonymy of Proceratophrys boiei by Prado and Pombal, 2008, Arq. Zool., São Paulo, 39: 38, where it had been placed by Bokermann, 1966, Lista Anot. Local. Tipo Anf. Brasil.: 26, and Izecksohn and Peixoto, 1981, Rev. Brasil. Biol., 41: 19–24. See account by Prado and Pombal, 2008, Arq. Zool., São Paulo, 39: 1–85 [38–43]. Nascimento, Lisboa, Skuk, and de Sá, 2010, S. Am. J. Herpetol., 5: 241–248, reported on larval morphology. Santana, Rodriguez, Albuquerque, Laranjeiras, Protázio, França, and Mesquita, 2011, Zootaxa, 2809: 67–68, reported on the advertisement call. Mângia, Guimarães, and Feio, 2012, Check List, 8: 298–299, provided a range extension in Minas Gerais, and a range map. Dubeux, Silva, Nascimento, Gonçalves, and Mott, 2019, Rev. Nordestina Zool., 12: 18–52, summarized the literature on larval morphology. See Dubeux, Nascimento, Lima, Magalhães, Silva, Gonçalves, Almeida, Correia, Garda, Mesquita, Rossa-Feres, and Mott, 2020, Biota Neotrop., 20 (2: e20180718): 1–24, for characterization and identification of larvae north of the Rio São Francisco in the Atlantic Forest of northeastern Brazil. Bastos and Zina, 2022, Herpetol. Notes, 15: 365–376, reported the species from Jequié municipality, Bahia, Brazil, and briefly discussed its habitat and conservation status. Dubeux, Lisboa, Nascimento, Araujo, Tiburcio, Torquato da Silva, Freitas, Guarnieri, and Mott, 2024, Stud. Neotrop. Fauna Environ., 59: 967–982, reported the species from Estação Ecológica de Murici, Alagoas state, Brazil, and discussed its habitat.
External links:
Please note: these links will take you to external websites not affiliated with the American Museum of Natural History. We are not responsible for their content.
- For access to general information see Wikipedia
- For additional sources of general information from other websites search Google
- For access to relevant technical literature search Google Scholar
- For images search CalPhoto Images and Google Images
- To search the NIH genetic sequence database, see GenBank
- For additional information see AmphibiaWeb report
- For information on conservation status and distribution see the IUCN Redlist
- For related information on conservation and images as well as observations see iNaturalist