- What is Amphibian Species of the World?
- How to cite
- How to use
- Structure of the taxonomic records
- Running log of additions and corrections, 2024
- Logs of changes and additions, 2014–2023
- What is the right name?
- Curator's blog
- Amphibian Species of the World on social media
- History of the project, 1980 to 2024
- Comments on amphibian taxonomy relating to versions 3.0 to 6.2 (2004 to 2024)
- Scientific Nomenclature and its Discontents: Comments by Frost on Rules and Philosophy of Taxonomy, Ranks, and Their Applications
- Contributors, online editions
- Contributors and reviewers for Amphibian Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (1985)
- Versions
- Museum abbreviations
- Links to useful amphibian systematic, conservation, collection management, informational, and/or regional sites
- Links to useful FREE library sites
- Copyright and terms of use
Cacosternum boettgeri (Boulenger, 1882)
Arthroleptis boettgeri Boulenger, 1882, Cat. Batr. Sal. Coll. Brit. Mus., Ed. 2: 118. Syntypes: BMNH (4 specimens), including animal figured on pl. 11, fig. 6 in the original publication; these specimens being BMNH 1947.2.30.77–80 (formerly 1879.8.5.18–21) according to museum records. Lambiris, 1988, Lammergeyer, 39: 110, reported a BMNH "holotype". Type locality: "Vleis [= grassy marshes], Kaffraria", Cape Province, Rep. South Africa.
Cacosternum boettgeri — Boulenger, 1906, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., Ser. 7, 17: 317–323; Boulenger, 1910, Ann. S. Afr. Mus., 5: 533.
Arthroleptis schebeni Nieden, 1914 "1913", Sitzungsber. Ges. Naturforsch. Freunde Berlin, 1913: 451. Syntypes: ZMB (4 specimens), by original designation. Type locality: "Deutsch-Südwestafrika [= Namibia] .... Klein Nauas (in der Kalahari". Synonymy by Mertens, 1955, Abh. Senckenb. Naturforsch. Ges., 490: 1–171.
Cacosternum boettgeri boettgeri — Hewitt, 1926, Ann. Natal Mus., 5: 440.
Common Names
Boettger's Frog (Hewitt, 1937, Guide Vert. Fauna E. Cape Province, Rept. Amph. Fishes: 104).
Dainty Frog (Pienaar, 1963, Koedoe, 6: 80; Wager, 1965, Frogs S. Afr.: 167).
Common Caco (Passmore and Carruthers, 1979, S. Afr. Frogs: 182).
Common Dainty Frog (Passmore and Carruthers, 1979, S. Afr. Frogs: 182).
Boettger's Dainty Frog (Broadley, 1973, J. Herpetol. Assoc. Afr., 10: 23; Passmore and Carruthers, 1978, J. Herpetol. Assoc. Afr., 19: 6; Passmore and Carruthers, 1979, S. Afr. Frogs: 182; Lambiris, 1990 "1989", Monogr. Mus. Reg. Sci. Nat. Torino, 10: 131; Channing, 2001, Amph. Cent. S. Afr.: 287; Scott, 2004, in Minter et al. (eds.), Atlas Frogs S. Afr. Lesotho and Swaziland: 222).
Boettger's Froglet (Van Dijk, 1978, J. Herpetol. Assoc. Afr., 17: 16; Broadley, 1978, J. Herpetol. Assoc. Afr., 19: 34; Passmore and Carruthers, 1978, J. Herpetol. Assoc. Afr., 19: 6; Passmore and Carruthers, 1979, S. Afr. Frogs: 182).
Boettger's Metal Frog (Frank and Ramus, 1995, Compl. Guide Scient. Common Names Amph. Rept. World: 98).
Boettger's Caco (Scott, 2004, in Minter et al. (eds.), Atlas Frogs S. Afr. Lesotho and Swaziland: 222; Du Preez and Carruthers, 2009, Compl. Guide Frogs S. Afr.: 364).
Boettger's Dainty Frog (Largen and Spawls, 2010, Amph. Rept. Ethiopia Eritrea: 198; Channing, Schmitz, Burger, and Kielgast, 2013, Zootaxa, 3701: 529).
Distribution
Throughout Namibia to at least the Angola border (see comment), Rep. South Africa, Eswatini, southern Mozambique, southern Botswana, through Zimbabwe to southern Zambia (see comment); expected in northeastern Angola; see comment regarding Ethiopian records.
Geographic Occurrence
Natural Resident: Botswana, Eswatini, Ethiopia, Lesotho, Mozambique, Namibia, South Africa, Zambia, Zimbabwe
Likely/Controversially Present: Angola
Comment
See accounts by Poynton, 1964, Ann. Natal Mus., 17: 146–147, Poynton and Broadley, 1985, Ann. Natal Mus., 27: 174, Lambiris, 1988, Lammergeyer, 39: 110–111, Channing, 2001, Amph. Cent. S. Afr.: 287–288, Pickersgill, 2007, Frog Search: 284–286, and Du Preez and Carruthers, 2009, Compl. Guide Frogs S. Afr.: 364-365. See comment under Cacosternum striatus. Largen, 2001, Tropical Zool., 14: 344, commented on distribution. Channing and Howell, 2006, Amph. E. Afr.: 263-264, removed the Tanzania and Kenya population from this taxon as Cacosternum plimptoni. With the removal of Cacosternum plimptoni the status of the Ethiopian population remains questionable as noted by Zimkus, 2008, Herpetol. Rev., 39: 233. Bates and Haacke, 2003, Navors. Nas. Mus. Bloemfontein, 19: 1137–138, discussed the species in Lesotho. See account, photograph, and map for Ethiopia by Largen and Spawls, 2010, Amph. Rept. Ethiopia Eritrea: 198–199. Channing, Schmitz, Burger, and Kielgast, 2013, Zootaxa, 3701: 529–530, commented on this species and placed it phylogenetically and suggested that the Ethiopian population assigned to this species almost certainly is an unnamed species. Channing, Rödel, and Channing, 2012, Tadpoles of Africa: 332, provided information on comparative larval morphology. Baptista, Conradie, Vaz Pinto, and Branch, 2019, In Huntley, Russo, Lages, and Ferrand (eds.), Biodiversity in Angola: 258, noted specimens near the Angola border in the Caprivi strip of Namibia, and Omusati and southern provinces of Zambia, adjacent to the Angola border, suggesting its eventual discovery there. Phaka, Netherlands, Kruger, and Du Preez, 2017, Bilingual Field Guide Frogs Zululand: 62, provided a photograph, Zululand regional map, and a brief account of life history and identification. Channing and Rödel, 2019, Field Guide Frogs & Other Amph. Afr.: 368–369, provided a brief account, photograph, and range map which cast doubt on records from Zimbabwe and Zambia.
External links:
Please note: these links will take you to external websites not affiliated with the American Museum of Natural History. We are not responsible for their content.
- For access to general information see Wikipedia
- For additional sources of general information from other websites search Google
- For access to relevant technical literature search Google Scholar
- For images search CalPhoto Images and Google Images
- To search the NIH genetic sequence database, see GenBank
- For additional information see AmphibiaWeb report
- For information on conservation status and distribution see the IUCN Redlist
- For information on distribution, habitat, and conservation see the Map of Life
- For related information on conservation and images as well as observations see iNaturalist
- For access to available specimen data for this species, from over 350 scientific collections, go to Vertnet.