- What is Amphibian Species of the World?
- How to cite
- How to use
- Structure of the taxonomic records
- Running log of additions and corrections, 2024
- Logs of changes and additions, 2014–2023
- What is the right name?
- Curator's blog
- History of the project, 1980 to 2024
- Comments on amphibian taxonomy relating to versions 3.0 to 6.2 (2004 to 2024)
- Scientific Nomenclature and its Discontents: Comments by Frost on Rules and Philosophy of Taxonomy, Ranks, and Their Applications
- Contributors, online editions
- Contributors and reviewers for Amphibian Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (1985)
- Versions
- Museum abbreviations
- Links to useful amphibian systematic, conservation, collection management, informational, and/or regional sites
- Links to useful FREE library sites
- Copyright and terms of use
Cacosternum plimptoni Channing, Brun, Burger, Febvre, and Moyer, 2005
Cacosternum plimptoni Channing, Brun, Burger, Febvre, and Moyer, 2005, Afr. J. Herpetol., 54: 140. Holotype: MHNG 2661.18, by original designation. Type locality: "Musabi Plain (02° 17′ 16″ S; 34° 28′ 16″ E; 1297 m), in the Serengeti National Park, Tanzania".
Common Names
Plimpton's Dainty Frog (original publication).
Distribution
Northern Tanzania and the from both sides of the rift valley of southwestern Kenya, at altitudes between 1000 and 2000 m; Uganda; reported from Akagera National Park, Eastern Province, Rwanda (at 1290 m elevation); possibly from Oromia Region of Ethiopia (see comment);
Geographic Occurrence
Natural Resident: Congo, Democratic Republic of the, Kenya, Rwanda, Tanzania, Uganda
Likely/Controversially Present: Ethiopia
Comment
Indistinguishable morphologically from Cacosternum boettgeri according to the original publication. Channing and Howell, 2006, Amph. E. Afr.: 263-264, noted a then-unnamed species, "Plimpton's Dainty Frog", and for which they provided an account. Zimkus, 2008, Herpetol. Rev., 39: 233, provided records for the Oromia region of Ethiopia and discussed briefly the taxonomic issues. See comments in Channing, Schmitz, Burger, and Kielgast, 2013, Zootaxa, 3701: 518-550, regarding systematics and biology, but did not mention the Ethiopian records, implying that they were unsure whether this population is conspecific with the more southerly ones. Spawls, Wasonga, and Drewes, 2019, Amph. Kenya: 34, provided a range map for Kenya, photograph, and brief characterization. Channing and Rödel, 2019, Field Guide Frogs & Other Amph. Afr.: 372–373, provided a brief account, photograph, and range map, which implied that they did not include the Ethiopian population in this taxon. Dehling and Sinsch, 2023, Diversity, 15 (512): 1–81, discussed the range, identification, natural history, advertisement call, and conservation status in Rwanda.
External links:
Please note: these links will take you to external websites not affiliated with the American Museum of Natural History. We are not responsible for their content.
- For access to general information see Wikipedia
- For additional sources of general information from other websites search Google
- For access to relevant technical literature search Google Scholar
- For images search CalPhoto Images and Google Images
- To search the NIH genetic sequence database, see GenBank
- For additional information see AmphibiaWeb report
- For information on conservation status and distribution see the IUCN Redlist
- For information on distribution, habitat, and conservation see the Map of Life
- For related information on conservation and images as well as observations see iNaturalist
- For access to available specimen data for this species, from over 350 scientific collections, go to Vertnet.