- Amphibian Species of the World on Twitter
- What is the right name?
- Curator's blog
- Running log of additions and changes, 2023
- Logs of changes and additions, 2014–2022
- How to cite
- How to use
- History of the project, 1980 to 2023
- Comments on amphibian taxonomy relating to versions 3.0 to 6.2 (2004 to 2023)
- Scientific Nomenclature and Its Discontents
- Structure of the taxonomic records
- Contributors and reviewers for Amphibian Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (1985)
- Contributors, online editions
- Versions
- Museum abbreviations
- Links to useful amphibian systematic, conservation, collection management, informational, and/or regional sites
- Links to useful FREE library sites
- Copyright and terms of use
Polypedates braueri (Vogt, 1911)
Rhacophorus braueri Vogt, 1911, Sitzungsber. Ges. Naturforsch. Freunde Berlin, 1911: 180. Syntypes: ZMB 21945 (9 specimens); Kuraishi, Matsui, Ota, and Chen, 2011, Zootaxa, 2744: 60, designated ZMB 21945 lectotype, the others in the former syntypic series being renumbered ZMB 65913–65920. Type locality: "Formosa" (= Taiwan), China.
Rhacophorus (Rhacophorus) baueri — Ahl, 1931, Das Tierreich, 55: 137.
Polypedates baueri — Kuraishi, Matsui, Ota, and Chen, 2011, Zootaxa, 2744: 53–61.
English Names
White-lipped Treefrog (Lue, Tu, and Hsiang, 1999, Atlas Taiwan Amph. Rept.: 42 [as Polypedates megacephalus]).
Java Treefrog (Lue, Tu, and Hsiang, 1999, Atlas Taiwan Amph. Rept.: 42 [as Polypedates megacephalus; with taxonomic adjustment, this is now inappropriate, as the species does not occur in Java—DRF]).
Taiwan Whipping Frog (Poyarkov, Nguyen, Popov, Geissler, Pawangkhanant, Neang, Suwannapoom, and Orlov, 2021, Russ. J. Herpetol., 28 (3A): 58).
Upland Treefrog (Zug, 2022, Smithson. Contrib. Zool., 653: 42).
Distribution
Tropical and subtropical China (including parts of Tibet [Medog], Yunnan, Sichuan, Guangxi, Guangdong, Fujian, Zhejiang, and Anhui) as well as Taiwan, and Lao Cai, Vietnam; also Phitsanulok, Thailand; Tai Nai Township and Putao District, Kachin State, Myanmar; Mizoram, northeastern India; introduced into Guam; expected to occur in Laos.
Geographic Occurrence
Natural Resident: China, People's Republic of, India, Myanmar, Taiwan, Thailand, Vietnam
Likely/Controversially Present: Laos
Introduced: Guam
Comment
Removed from the synonymy of Polypedates megacephalus by Kuraishi, Matsui, Ota, and Chen, 2011, Zootaxa, 2744: 53–61, where it had been placed by Stejneger, 1925, Proc. U.S. Natl. Mus., 66: 30; Ahl, 1931, Das Tierreich, 55: 137; Wolf, 1936, Bull. Raffles Mus., 12: 178; and Zhao and Adler, 1993, Herpetol. China: 156. Okada, 1931, Tailless Batr. Japan. Empire: 184–185, for review (as Rhacophorus leucomystax) of Taiwan (China) population. Lue, Tu, and Hsiang, 1999, Atlas Taiwan Amph. Rept.: 42–43, provided a brief account (as Polypedates megacephalus) for Taiwan. Introduced populations from Okinawa (Japan) and Guam may be of this species rather than Polypedates megacephalus. Records of Polypedates megacephalus from Taiwan apply to this species. Kuraishi, Matsui, Hamidy, Belabut, Ahmad, Panha, Sudin, Yong, Jiang, Ota, Thong, and Nishikawa, 2013, Zool. Scripta, 42: 54–70, discussed the taxonomic status of this member of the Polypedates leucomystax group. Pan, Dang, Wang, Zheng, Rao, and Li, 2013, Asian Herpetol. Res., 4: 124–133, provided a phylogeny reconstruction of the Polypedates leucomystax that suggested that this species extends to Yunnan, Sichuan, Guangxi, Guangdong, Fujian, Jiangxi, Zhejiang, and Anhui. Zug, 2013, Rept. Amph. Pacific Is.: 77–68, provided a brief discussion of the introduced Guam population. Huang, Li, Luo, Ni, Yao, Xu, Zeng, Li, Wei, and Zhang, 2019, MtDNA, Part B, 4: 1739–1740, reported on the complete mt genome. Rahman, Chen, Wu, Chen, Lwin, Murphy, Li, and Che, 2020, Zootaxa, 4742: 531–541, provided the extreme northern Myanmar and Xizang records, genetically confirmed. Lalronunga, Vanramliana, Lalrinchhana, Vanlalhrima, Sailo, Lalnunhlua, Sailo, Zosangliana, Lalhmangaiha, and Lalhmingliani, 2020, Sci. Vision, 20: 106–117, provided a record from Mizoram, northeastern India, genetically confirmed. Che, Jiang, Yan, and Zhang, 2020, Amph. Rept. Tibet: 348–352, provided a detailed account for Tibet, China. Yuan, Deng, Jiang, Klaus, Orlov, Yang, and Li, 2021, Zool. Res., Kunming, 42: supplmentary data, provided a genetically-confirmed locality from Phu Hin Rong, Phitsanulok, north-central Thailand. Zug, 2022, Smithson. Contrib. Zool., 653: 42, briefly discussed habitat, range, and identification in Myanmar.
External links:
Please note: these links will take you to external websites not affiliated with the American Museum of Natural History. We are not responsible for their content.
- For additional sources of general information from other websites search Google
- For access to relevant technical literature search Google Scholar
- For images search CalPhoto Images and Google Images
- To search the NIH genetic sequence database, see GenBank
- For additional information see AmphibiaWeb report
- For information on conservation status and distribution see the IUCN Redlist
- For information on distribution, habitat, and conservation see the Map of Life
- For related information on conservation and images as well as observation see iNaturalist
- For additional information specific to China see Amphibia China
- For access to available specimen data for this species, from over 350 scientific collections, go to Vertnet.