- What is Amphibian Species of the World?
- How to cite
- How to use
- Structure of the taxonomic records
- Running log of additions and changes, 2025
- Logs of changes and additions, 2014–2024
- What is the right name?
- Curator's blog
- History of the project, 1980 to 2024
- Comments on amphibian taxonomy relating to versions 3.0 to 6.2 (2004 to 2024)
- Scientific Nomenclature and its Discontents: Comments by Frost on Rules and Philosophy of Taxonomy, Ranks, and Their Applications
- Contributors, online editions
- Contributors and reviewers for Amphibian Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (1985)
- Versions
- Museum abbreviations
- Links to useful amphibian systematic, conservation, collection management, informational, and/or regional sites
- Links to useful FREE library sites
- Copyright and terms of use
Scaphiopodidae Cope, 1865
Scaphiopodidae Cope, 1865, Nat. Hist. Rev., N.S., 5: 104. Type genus: Scaphiopus Holbrook, 1836.
Scaphiopidae — Cope, 1865, Nat. Hist. Rev., N.S., 5: 107. Error for Scaphiopodidae.
Scaphiopodina — Mivart, 1869, Proc. Zool. Soc. London, 1869: 291.
Scaphiopodidae — Günther, 1901, Biol. Centr. Amer., Rept. Batr., Vol. 7, Part 164: 258; Storer, 1925, Univ. California Publ. Zool., 27: 43.
Scaphiopinae — Špinar, 1972, Tertiary Frogs Cent. Eur.: 234. Incorrect subsequent spelling.
Scaphiopodidae — Roček, 1981 "1980", Acta Univ. Carol., Prague, Biol., 1980: 151; García-París, Buchholz, and Parra-Olea, 2003, Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 28: 12.
Scaphiopodinae — Dubois, 1983, Bull. Mens. Soc. Linn. Lyon, 52: 271.
Scaphiopoidea — Dubois, Ohler, and Pyron, 2021, Megataxa, 5: 135. Superfamily.
Common Names
Burrowing Toads (Fowler, 1907, Annu. Rep. N.J. State Mus. for 1906: 92).
Spadefoots (Cochran, 1961, Living Amph. World: 56).
Spadefoot Toads (Frank and Ramus, 1995, Compl. Guide Scient. Common Names Amph. Rept. World: 96).
Nearctic Spadefoot Toads (Vitt and Caldwell, 2009, Herpetology, 3rd Ed.: 444).
Nearctic Spadefoots (Painter, Stuart, Giermakowski, and Pierce, 2017, Western Wildlife, 4: 34).
Distribution
Southern Canada and USA south to temperate southern Mexico.
Comment
Frost, Grant, Faivovich, Bain, Haas, Haddad, de Sá, Channing, Wilkinson, Donnellan, Raxworthy, Campbell, Blotto, Moler, Drewes, Nussbaum, Lynch, Green, and Wheeler, 2006, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., 297, considered Scaphiopodidae to form the sister taxon of Pelodytidae and reviewed the relevant phylogenetic literature of the group. Roelants, Gower, Wilkinson, Loader, Biju, Guillaume, Moriau, and Bossuyt, 2007, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 104: 887–892, suggested that Scaphiopodidae is the sister taxon of remaining Anomocoela (Pelobatidae, Pelodytidae, and Megophryidae), this confirmed by Zhang, Liang, Hillis, Wake, and Cannatella, 2013, Mol. Biol. Evol., 30: 1899–1915, on the basis of analysis of complete mtDNA genomes. See discussion under Pelobatidae regarding the exclusion of this group from that family. Dubois, 2005, Alytes, 23: 8, regarded Scaphiopodidae to be one of four subfamilies of Pelobatidae (Megophryinae, Pelodytinae, and Pelobatinae being the others), but subsequently accepted the four-family arrangement (see Fouquette and Dubois, 2014, Checklist N.A. Amph. Rept.: 257). Vitt and Caldwell, 2009, Herpetology, 3rd Ed.: 444–445, provided a general taxonomic account and map as part of a much more general and extensive overview of amphibian biology. Pyron and Wiens, 2011, Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 61: 543–583, confirmed the placement of Scaphiopodidae as the sister taxon of Pelodytidae + (Pelobatidae+ Megophryidae). Blackburn and Wake, 2011, In Zhang (ed.), Zootaxa, 3148: 39–55, briefly reviewed the taxonomic history of this taxon. Powell, Collins, and Hooper, 2011, Key Herpetofauna U.S. & Canada, 2nd Ed.: 37–38, provided a key to the genera and species. Vitt and Caldwell, 2014, Herpetology, 4th Ed., provided a summary of life history, diagnosis, and taxonomy. Lemos-Espinal and Dixon, 2013, Amphibians and Reptiles of San Luis Potosí: 75-76, provided an account for San Luis Potosí, Mexico. Blotto, Pereyra, Grant, and Faivovich, 2020, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., 443: 34, discussed possible morphological synapmorphies for the group, particularly of hand and foot morphology. Elias-Costa, Araujo-Vieira, and Faivovich, 2021, Cladistics, 37: 498–517, discussed the evolution of submandibular musculature optimized on the tree of Jetz and Pyron, 2018, Nature Ecol. & Evol., 2: 850–858, which provided morphological synapomorphies of this taxon.
Contained taxa (7 sp.):
External links:
Please note: these links will take you to external websites not affiliated with the American Museum of Natural History. We are not responsible for their content.
- For access to general information see Wikipedia
- For additional sources of general information from other websites search Google
- For access to relevant technical literature search Google Scholar
- For images search CalPhoto Images and Google Images
- To search the NIH genetic sequence database, see GenBank
- For related information on conservation and images as well as observations see iNaturalist