- What is Amphibian Species of the World?
- How to cite
- How to use
- Structure of the taxonomic records
- Running log of additions and changes, 2025
- Logs of changes and additions, 2014–2024
- What is the right name?
- Curator's blog
- History of the project, 1980 to 2024
- Comments on amphibian taxonomy relating to versions 3.0 to 6.2 (2004 to 2024)
- Scientific Nomenclature and its Discontents: Comments by Frost on Rules and Philosophy of Taxonomy, Ranks, and Their Applications
- Contributors, online editions
- Contributors and reviewers for Amphibian Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (1985)
- Versions
- Museum abbreviations
- Links to useful amphibian systematic, conservation, collection management, informational, and/or regional sites
- Links to useful FREE library sites
- Copyright and terms of use
Desmognathus auriculatus (Holbrook, 1838)
Salamandra auriculata Holbrook, 1838, N. Am. Herpetol., 3: 115. Type(s): Animal figured on pl. 28; listed by Dunn, 1926, Salamanders Fam. Plethodontidae: 98, as USNM 3901, but not mentioned in USNM list of types by Cochran, 1961, Bull. U.S. Natl. Mus., 220, and discounted by Adler, 1976, Holbrook’s N. Am. Herpetol.: xxxviii. Specimens of this taxon presented to ANSP by Holbrook according to Hallowell, 1858, J. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia, Ser. 2, 3: 344. MNHNP 4675 discussed and designated lectotype by Pyron and Beamer, 2022, Zootaxa, 5134: 164. Type locality: "Riceborough, [Liberty County,] in Georgia", USA. Lectotype from "Georgie" but restricted to "Woodmanston Plantation near Riceboro, Liberty Co., Georgia" with discussion by Pyron and Beamer, 2022, Zootaxa, 5134: 164..
Desmognathus auriculatus — Baird, 1850 "1849", J. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia, Ser. 2, 1: 286.
Cylindrosoma auriculatum — Duméril, Bibron, and Duméril, 1854, Erp. Gen., 9: 81.
Plethodon auriculatum — Hallowell, 1858, J. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia, Ser. 2, 3: 344.
Desmognathus fuscus var. auriculata — Cope, 1869, Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia, 21: 116.
Desmognathus fuscus auriculatus — Boulenger, 1882, Cat. Batr. Grad. Batr. Apoda Coll. Brit. Mus., Ed. 2: 78.
Desmognathus auriculata — Lönnberg, 1894, Proc. U.S. Natl. Mus., 17: 337.
Desmognathus fuscus carri Neill, 1951, Publ. Res. Div. Ross Allen’s Rept. Inst., 1: 25. Holotype: ERA-WTN 14188, by original designation; now in UF. Type locality: "Silver Glen Springs, in the Ocala National Forest, Marion County, Florida", USA. Subspecies status as distinct from Desmognathus auriculatus rejected by Rossman, 1959, Herpetologica, 15: 149-155, and Means, 1974, Bull. Florida State Mus., Biol. Sci., 18: 36. See comment.
Desmognathus auriculatus — Valentine, 1963, Copeia, 1963: 130.
Desmognathus (Desmognathus) auriculatus — Dubois and Raffaëlli, 2012, Alytes, 28: 145. See comment under Desmognathus regarding the status of these subgenera.
Common Names
Eared Triton (Desmognathus auriculatus: Yarrow, 1882, Bull. U.S. Natl. Mus., 24: 22).
Eared Salamander (Desmognathus fuscus auriculatus: Löding, 1922, Mus. Pap. Alabama Mus. Nat. Hist., 5: 15).
Southern Dusky Salamander (Desmognathus auriculatus: Bishop, 1943, Handb. Salamanders: 193; Conant, Cagle, Goin, Lowe, Neill, Netting, Schmidt, Shaw, Stebbins, and Bogert, 1956, Copeia, 1956: 174; Conant, 1975, Field Guide Rept. Amph. E. Cent. N. Am., Ed. 2: 263; Collins, Huheey, Knight, and Smith, 1978, Herpetol. Circ., 7: 5; Frank and Ramus, 1995, Compl. Guide Scient. Common Names Amph. Rept. World: 31; Collins, 1997, Herpetol. Circ., 25: 6; Crother, Boundy, Campbell, de Queiroz, Frost, Highton, Iverson, Meylan, Reeder, Seidel, Sites, Taggart, Tilley, and Wake, 2001 "2000", Herpetol. Circ., 29: 20; Tilley, Highton, and Wake, 2012, in Crother (ed.), Herpetol. Circ., 39: 16; Collins and Taggart, 2009, Standard Common Curr. Sci. Names N. Am. Amph. Turtles Rept. Crocodil., ed. 6: 11; Tilley, Highton, and Wake, 2012, in Crother (ed.), Herpetol. Circ., 39: 25; Powell, Conant, and Collins, 2016, Field Guide Rept. Amph. E. North Am., 4th ed.: 42; Highton, Bonett, and Jockusch, 2017, in Crother (ed.), Herpetol. Circ., 43: 25).
Dusky Salamander (Desmognathus fuscus auriculatus: Viosca, 1949, Pop. Sci. Bull., Louisiana Acad. Sci., 1: 9).
Southeastern Dusky Salamander (Desmognathus fuscus auriculatus: Carr, 1940, Univ. Florida Biol. Sci. Ser., 3: 51).
Coast Plain Dusky Salamander (Desmognathus auriculatus: Schmidt, 1953, Check List N. Am. Amph. Rept., Ed. 6: 29).
Ocala Dusky Salamander (Desmognathus fuscus carri [no longer recognized]: Schmidt, 1953, Check List N. Am. Amph. Rept., Ed. 6: 29).
Peninsula Dusky Salamander (Desmognathus fuscus carri [no longer recognized]: Conant, Cagle, Goin, Lowe, Neill, Netting, Schmidt, Shaw, Stebbins, and Bogert, 1956, Copeia, 1956: 174).
Distribution
Coastal Plain of Georgia and adjacent northern Florida, western to southern Alabama adjacent to the Florida panhandle, USA. See comment.
Geographic Occurrence
Natural Resident: United States of America, United States of America - Alabama, United States of America - Florida, United States of America - Georgia
Endemic: United States of America
Comment
With the recognition of Desmognathus valtos, much of the earlier literature of nominal Desmognathus auriculatus addresses both species, so employ caution in using all literature prior to 2022. See detailed acounts by Means, 1999, Cat. Am. Amph. Rept., 681: 1–6, and Petranka, 1998, Salamand. U.S. Canada: 164–166. Beamer and Lamb, 2008, Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 47: 143–153, discussed the status of populations of this nominal species on the basis of an mtDNA phylogeny and suggested that populations had previously been misidentified due to morphological plasticity convergence, rather than mitochondial introgression; specimens from eastern Texas previously assigned to this species are actually Desmognathus conanti. Further, they suggested that the population from which the type-specimen is restricted to the area of the Coastal Plain of Georgia and that populations, other populations formerly assigned to Desmognathus "auriculatus" being parts of nominal Desmognathus fuscus, Desmognathus conanti, or and unnamed species. Means, 2005, in Lannoo (ed.), Amph. Declines: 700–701, provided an account containing a detailed summary of the literature and range. Altig and McDiarmid, 2015, Handb. Larval Amph. US and Canada: 101–102, provided an account of larval morphology. Means, Lamb, and Bernardo, 2017, Zootaxa, 4263: 467–506, redlimited the species. Pyron, O'Connell, Lemmon, Lemmon, and Beamer, 2020, Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 146 (106751): 1–13, suggested on molecular grounds that this nominal species is a complex composed of three lineages which they designatus A, B, and C. Pyron and Beamer, 2022, Zootaxa, 5188: 587–595, demonstrated that Desmognathus auriculatus A can confidently be assigned the name Desmognathus auriculatus, and B/C can be assigned to their new Desmognathus valtos. Pyron, Beamer, Holzheuser, Lemmon, Lemmon, Wynn, and O'Connell, 2022, Conserv. Genetics, 23: 375–386, suggested on the basis of DNA extracted from formalin-fixed specimens that nominal Desmognathus fuscus carri (and the associated Florida peninsular populations of Desmognathus auriculatus) may have formed a distinctive population of Desmognathus auriculatus, all now extinct. Raffaëlli, 2022, Salamanders & Newts of the World: 1000–1001, provided an account summarizing systematics, morphology, life history, population status, and distribution (including a polygon map).
External links:
Please note: these links will take you to external websites not affiliated with the American Museum of Natural History. We are not responsible for their content.
- For access to general information see Wikipedia
- For additional sources of general information from other websites search Google
- For access to relevant technical literature search Google Scholar
- For images search CalPhoto Images and Google Images
- To search the NIH genetic sequence database, see GenBank
- For additional information see AmphibiaWeb report
- For information on conservation status and distribution see the IUCN Redlist
- For information on distribution, habitat, and conservation see the Map of Life
- For related information on conservation and images as well as observations see iNaturalist