Plethodon mississippi Highton, 1989

Class: Amphibia > Order: Caudata > Family: Plethodontidae > Subfamily: Plethodontinae > Genus: Plethodon > Species: Plethodon mississippi

Plethodon mississippi Highton in Highton, Maha, and Maxson, 1989, Illinois Biol. Monogr., 57: 65. Holotype: USNM 257388, by original designation. Type locality: "locality 79 [34° 36′ 38″ N, 88° 11′ 56″ W]. . . , Tishomingo State Park, at an elevation of 177 m, Tishomingo County, Mississippi", USA. Synonymy with Plethodon grobmani by Guyer, Goetz, Folt, Joyce, and Hayes, 2019, Copeia, 107: 694–700, and with Plethodon glutinosus by Joyce, Hayes, Potter, and Guyer, 2019, Copeia, 107: 701–707

Plethodon (Plethodon) mississippi — Vieites, Nieto-Roman, Wake, and Wake, 2011, Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 59: 632, by implication.

Common Names

Mississippi Slimy Salamander (Plethodon mississippi [no longer recognized} Highton in Highton, Maha, and Maxson, 1989, Illinois Biol. Monogr., 57: 65; Frank and Ramus, 1995, Compl. Guide Scient. Common Names Amph. Rept. World: 33; Collins, 1997, Herpetol. Circ., 25: 8; Crother, Boundy, Campbell, de Queiroz, Frost, Highton, Iverson, Meylan, Reeder, Seidel, Sites, Taggart, Tilley, and Wake, 2001 "2000", Herpetol. Circ., 29: 27; Tilley, Highton, and Wake, 2012, in Crother (ed.), Herpetol. Circ., 39: 21; Collins and Taggart, 2009, Standard Common Curr. Sci. Names N. Am. Amph. Turtles Rept. Crocodil., ed. 6: 14; Tilley, Highton, and Wake, 2012, in Crother (ed.), Herpetol. Circ., 39: 30; Highton, Bonett, and Jockusch, 2017, in Crother (ed.), Herpetol. Circ., 43: 31).

Distribution

Extreme western Kentucky and central Alabama south to the western side of Mobile Bay and southeastern Louisiana, USA. 

Geographic Occurrence

Natural Resident: United States of America, United States of America - Alabama, United States of America - Kentucky, United States of America - Louisiana, United States of America - Mississippi, United States of America - Tennessee

Endemic: United States of America

Comment

In the Plethodon glutinosus group of Highton and Larson, 1979, Syst. Zool., 28: 579–599. Petranka, 1998, Salamand. U.S. Canada: 355, rejected the distinction of Plethodon grobmani from Plethodon glutinosus on the basis of overall similarity. Guyer, Goetz, Folt, Joyce, and Hayes, 2019, Copeia, 107: 694–700, suggested that no morphological distinction can be drawn between Plethodon grobmani and Plethodon mississippi in Alabama, suggesting the lack of a species boundary. Himes and Beckett, 2013, Southeast. Nat., 12: 851–856, presented morphometric evidence that Plethodon ainsworthi is a junior synonym of nominal Plethodon mississippi. Raffaëlli, 2013, Urodeles du Monde, 2nd ed.: 399–400, provided brief accounts, photographs, and range maps for nominal Plethodon glutinosus, Plethodon grobmani, and Plethodon mississippiJoyce, Hayes, Potter, and Guyer, 2019, Copeia, 107: 701–707, took issue with the genetic distance approach employed by Highton, Maha, and Maxson, 1989, Illinois Biol. Monogr., 57: 1–153, which is the basis upon which most of the species within the Plethodon glutinosus complex were named; Joyce et al. presented a molecular analysis that suggested no recognizable historical entities consistent with recognized species boundaries in Alabama and they embraced the pre-Highton et al (1989) taxonomy also embraced by Petranka, 1998, Salamand. U.S. CanadaRaffaëlli, 2022, Salamanders & Newts of the World: 921, provided an account summarizing systematics, morphology, life history, population status, and distribution (including a polygon map).  

External links:

Please note: these links will take you to external websites not affiliated with the American Museum of Natural History. We are not responsible for their content.