- What is Amphibian Species of the World?
- How to cite
- How to use
- Structure of the taxonomic records
- Newly described species, changes, and additions, 2026
- Logs of changes and additions, 2014–2025
- What is the right name?
- Curator's blog
- History of the project, 1980 to 2024
- Comments on amphibian taxonomy relating to versions 3.0 to 6.2 (2004 to 2024)
- Scientific Nomenclature and its Discontents: Comments by Frost on Rules and Philosophy of Taxonomy, Ranks, and Their Applications
- Contributors, online editions
- Contributors and reviewers for Amphibian Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (1985)
- Versions
- Museum abbreviations
- Links to useful amphibian systematic, conservation, collection management, informational, and/or regional sites
- Links to useful FREE library sites
- Copyright and terms of use
Proteus xanthostictus (Freyer. 1847)
Hypochthon xanthostictus Freyer, 1847, Allg. Deutsche Naturhist. Zeitung, 2: 38–43. Holotype: specimen figured in the original publication, lost. Type locality: Bedén ponor, near Laze in the Planinsko polje, Slovenia.
Hypochthon chrysostictus Freyer, 1849, Ber. Mitt.Freunden Naturw. Wien, 5: 56-58. Explicit replacement name for Hypochthon xanthostictus so therefore an objective synonymy by Dufresnes, Monod-Broca, Jelić, Šunje, Manenti, Barzaghi, Zimić, Chouchane, Denoël, Ohler, and Jablonski, 2026, Amphibia-Reptilia, Published online ahead of print: 32.
Hypochthon Haidingeri Fitzinger, 1850, Sitzungsber. Akad. Wiss. Wien, Phys. Math. Naturwiss. Kl., 5: 300. Syntypes: Not stated although clearly NHMW; NHMW 19963 (7 specimens), according to Häupl, Tiedemann, and Grillitsch, 1994, Kat. Wiss. Samml. Naturhist. Mus. Wien, 9: 13, and Gemel, Gassner, and Schweiger, 2019, Ann. Naturhist. Mus. Wien, Ser. B, 121: 40. 40 syntypes examined by Fitzinger according to Dufresnes, Monod-Broca, Jelić, Šunje, Manenti, Barzaghi, Zimić, Chouchane, Denoël, Ohler, and Jablonski, 2026, Amphibia-Reptilia, Published online ahead of print: 29. Type locality: "Kleinhäusler-Grotte", Slovenia. Validity doubted by implication of Schreiber, 1875, Herpetol. Eur.: 13–14. Synonymy with Proteus anguinus by Boulenger, 1882, Cat. Batr. Sal. Coll. Brit. Mus., Ed. 2: 85. Validity doubted by implication of Schreiber, 1875, Herpetol. Eur.: 13–14. Synonymy with Proteus xanthostictus by Dufresnes, Monod-Broca, Jelić, Šunje, Manenti, Barzaghi, Zimić, Chouchane, Denoël, Ohler, and Jablonski, 2026, Amphibia-Reptilia, Published online ahead of print: 25.
Proteus xanthostictus — Cope, 1866, J. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia, Ser. 2, 6: 103; Dufresnes, Monod-Broca, Jelić, Šunje, Manenti, Barzaghi, Zimić, Chouchane, Denoël, Ohler, and Jablonski, 2026, Amphibia-Reptilia, Published online ahead of print: 32.
Proteus haidingeri — Trontelj, Gorički, Konstanjšek, Zakšek, Delić, Bressi, Mauri, Lukić Bilela, Jalžić, and Recknagel, 2026, Nat. Sloveniae, 28: 12.
Common Names
Ljubljanica’s Olm (Dufresnes, Monod-Broca, Jelić, Šunje, Manenti, Barzaghi, Zimić, Chouchane, Denoël, Ohler, and Jablonski, 2026, Amphibia-Reptilia, Published online ahead of print: 29).
Ljubljaniški Močeril (Slovenian: Dufresnes, Monod-Broca, Jelić, Šunje, Manenti, Barzaghi, Zimić, Chouchane, Denoël, Ohler, and Jablonski, 2026, Amphibia-Reptilia, Published online ahead of print: 29).
Distribution
Distributed across the Ljubljanica karst of southwestern and southcentral Slovenia, from the upper Pivka and Lož-Cerknica basins through the Postojna-Planina cave system and Planinsko polje to the Ljubljanica springs near Vrhnika.
Geographic Occurrence
Natural Resident: Slovenia
Endemic: Slovenia
Comment
The Ljubljanica lineage of Dufresnes, Monod-Broca, Jelić, Šunje, Manenti, Barzaghi, Zimić, Chouchane, Denoël, Ohler, and Jablonski, 2026, Amphibia-Reptilia, Published online ahead of print: 32, where comparative morphology, morphometrics, molecular markers (mt- and nuDNA), a dot map of the distribution, habitat, and conservation status were provided. Removed from the synonymy of Proteus anguinus in the original publication, where it had been placed by Gray, 1850, Cat. Spec. Amph. Coll. Brit. Mus., Batr. Grad.: 65, and Boulenger, 1882, Cat. Batr. Grad. Batr. Apoda Coll. Brit. Mus., Ed. 2: 85. Validity had been doubted by implication of Schreiber, 1875, Herpetol. Eur.: 13–14.
External links:
Please note: these links will take you to external websites not affiliated with the American Museum of Natural History. We are not responsible for their content.
- For access to general information see Wikipedia
- For additional sources of general information from other websites search Google
- For access to relevant technical literature search Google Scholar
- For images search CalPhoto Images and Google Images
- To search the NIH genetic sequence database, see GenBank
- For related information on conservation and images as well as observations see iNaturalist