- What is Amphibian Species of the World?
- How to cite
- How to use
- Structure of the taxonomic records
- Running log of additions and corrections, 2024
- Logs of changes and additions, 2014–2023
- What is the right name?
- Curator's blog
- Amphibian Species of the World on social media
- History of the project, 1980 to 2024
- Comments on amphibian taxonomy relating to versions 3.0 to 6.2 (2004 to 2024)
- Scientific Nomenclature and its Discontents: Comments by Frost on Rules and Philosophy of Taxonomy, Ranks, and Their Applications
- Contributors, online editions
- Contributors and reviewers for Amphibian Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (1985)
- Versions
- Museum abbreviations
- Links to useful amphibian systematic, conservation, collection management, informational, and/or regional sites
- Links to useful FREE library sites
- Copyright and terms of use
Ichthyophiidae Taylor, 1968
Epicria Fitzinger, 1843, Syst. Rept.: 34. Type genus: Epicrium Wagler, 1828. Suppressed for purposes of priority but not homonymy in favor of Ichthyophiidae Taylor, 1968, by Opinion 1604, Anonymous, 1990, Bull. Zool. Nomencl., 47: 166.
Epicrina Bonaparte, 1845, Specchio Gen. Sist. Erpetol. Anfibiol. Ittiolog.: 6. Type genus: Epicrium Wagler, 1828.
Epicriina — Bonaparte, 1850, Conspect. Syst. Herpetol. Amph.: 1 p.
Ichthyophiidae Taylor, 1968, Caecilians of the World: 46. Type genus: Ichthyophis Fitzinger, 1826. Placed on Official List of Family-group Names in Zoology by Opinion 1604, Anonymous, 1990, Bull. Zool. Nomencl., 47: 166-167.
Uraeotyphlinae Nussbaum, 1979, Occas. Pap. Mus. Zool. Univ. Michigan, 687: 14. Type genus: Uraeotyphlus Peters, 1880 "1879". Synonymy by Frost, Grant, Faivovich, Bain, Haas, Haddad, de Sá, Channing, Wilkinson, Donnellan, Raxworthy, Campbell, Blotto, Moler, Drewes, Nussbaum, Lynch, Green, and Wheeler, 2006, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., 297: 166.
Epicriidae — Dubois, 1984, Alytes, 3: 113; Lescure, Renous, and Gasc, 1986, Mem. Soc. Zool. France, 43: 154.
Epicrioides — Lescure, Renous, and Gasc, 1986, Mem. Soc. Zool. France, 43: 154. Hyperfamily.
Epicrioidea — Lescure, Renous, and Gasc, 1986, Mem. Soc. Zool. France, 43: 154. Superfamily.
Epicrioidae — Lescure, Renous, and Gasc, 1986, Mem. Soc. Zool. France, 43: 154. Epifamily.
Epicriinae — Lescure, Renous, and Gasc, 1986, Mem. Soc. Zool. France, 43: 154. Subfamily.
Epicriilae — Lescure, Renous, and Gasc, 1986, Mem. Soc. Zool. France, 43: 154. Epifamily.
Uraeotyphlilae — Lescure, Renous, and Gasc, 1986, Mem. Soc. Zool. France, 43: 158. Infrafamily.
Uraeotyphlidae — Duellman and Trueb, 1986, Biol. Amph.: 510.
Epicriumidae — Anonymous, 1993, Bull. Zool. Nomencl., 50: 261–263. Opinion 1749, emendation conserving name.
Ichthyophidinae — Wollenberg and Measey, 2009, J. Evol. Biol., 22: 1051. Incorrect subsequent spelling.
Uraeotyphlidinae — Wollenberg and Measey, 2009, J. Evol. Biol., 22: 1051. Incorrect subsequent spelling.
Ichthyophioidea — Dubois, Ohler, and Pyron, 2021, Megataxa, 5: 272. Superfamily.
Common Names
Fish Caecilians (Frank and Ramus, 1995, Compl. Guide Scient. Common Names Amph. Rept. World: 25).
Indian Caecilians (Uraeotyphlidae [no longer recognized]: Frank and Ramus, 1995, Compl. Guide Scient. Common Names Amph. Rept. World: 26).
Old World Caecilians (Daniels, 2005, Amph. Peninsular India: 75).
Asian Tailed Caecilians (Vitt and Caldwell, 2009, Herpetology, 3rd Ed.: 415).
Kerala Caecilians (Uraeotyphlidae [no longer recognized]: Vitt and Caldwell, 2009, Herpetology, 3rd Ed.: 418).
Distribution
Philippines and India to southern China, Thailand, and the Malayan Archipelago to Wallace's Line.
Comment
Nussbaum, 1979, Occas. Pap. Mus. Zool. Univ. Michigan, 687: 27, considered Ichthyophiidae transitional between Rhinatrematidae and other caecilian families; Ichthyophiinae and Uraeotyphlinae were included by Nussbaum in Ichthyophiidae on the basis of patristic similarity, but he suggested that Uraeotyphlinae was the sister-group of the higher caecilians (at that time named Scolecomorphidae, Caeciliaidae, and Typhlonectidae) and that Ichthyophiinae was the sister-taxon of a group composed of Uraeotyphlinae + higher caecilians. Subsequently Wilkinson and Nussbaum, 1996, Copeia, 1996: 550–562, Wilkinson, 1997, Biol. Rev. Cambridge Philos. Soc., 72: 423–470, and Wilkinson, Sheps, Oommen, and Cohen, 2002, Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 23: 401–407, provided evidence that Uraeotyphlidae and Ichthyophiidae are sister taxa. Gower, Kupfer, Oommen, Himstedt, Nussbaum, Loader, Presswell, Müller, Krishna, Boistel, and Wilkinson, 2002, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. B, Biol. Sci., 269: 1563–1569, suggested on the basis of mtDNA sequence study that Uraeotyphlidae might be imbedded within Ichthyophiidae; this was subsequently confirmed by Frost, Grant, Faivovich, Bain, Haas, Haddad, de Sá, Channing, Wilkinson, Donnellan, Raxworthy, Campbell, Blotto, Moler, Drewes, Nussbaum, Lynch, Green, and Wheeler, 2006, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., 297: 113, who made the synonymy to render a monophyletic Ichthyophiidae (although they suggested that minimally Ichthyophis is paraphyletic with respect to Uraeotyphlus. Wilkinson and Nussbaum, 2006, In Exbrayat (ed.), Reprod. Biol. Phylog. Gymnophiona: 39–78, discussed evidence for this taxon. Nussbaum and Wilkinson, 1989, Herpetol. Monogr., 3: 31, suggested that Caudacaecilia and Ichthyophis might both be polyphyletic inasmuch as these taxa are based solely on single characters of known variability. See comment under Caudacaecilia. Matsui, Nishikawa, Sudin, and Mohamed, 2006, Copeia, 2006: 256–260, discussed the dubious distinction of Caudacaecilia and Ichthyophis as well. See comment under Ichthyophis malabarensis. Zhang and Wake, 2009, Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 53: 479–491, further corroborated the paraphyly of Ichthyophiidae in the older narrower sense with respect to nominal Uraeotyphlidae. Blackburn and Wake, 2011, In Zhang (ed.), Zootaxa, 3148: 39–55, briefly reviewed the taxonomic history of this taxon. San Mauro, Gower, Cotton, Zardoya, Wilkinson, and Massingham, 2012, Syst. Biol., 61: 661–674, confirmed the placement for Ichthyophiidae as the sister of all other caecilians, excluding Rhinatrematidae. Maddin, Russell, and Anderson, 2012, Zool. J. Linn. Soc., 166: 160–201, reported on the braincase of the family and confirmed its phylogenetic placement. Vitt and Caldwell, 2014, Herpetology, 4th Ed., provided a summary of range, diagnosis, life history, and taxonomy. See account of Chinese ichthyophiids by Fei and Ye, 2016, Amph. China, 1: 140–145. See Kamei, 2017, Das (ed.), Diversity Ecol. Amph. India: 49–72, for an overview of the species of northeastern India. Dubois, Ohler, and Pyron, 2021, Megataxa, 5: 1–738, resurrected Uraeotyphlidae on the basis of a different sample of species than that which provided a signal of paraphyly of Ichthyophis to Uraeotyphlus in the study of Frost, Grant, Faivovich, Bain, Haas, Haddad, de Sá, Channing, Wilkinson, Donnellan, Raxworthy, Campbell, Blotto, Moler, Drewes, Nussbaum, Lynch, Green, and Wheeler, 2006, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., 297: 1–370.
Contained taxa (57 sp.):
External links:
Please note: these links will take you to external websites not affiliated with the American Museum of Natural History. We are not responsible for their content.
- For access to general information see Wikipedia
- For additional sources of general information from other websites search Google
- For access to relevant technical literature search Google Scholar
- For images search CalPhoto Images and Google Images
- To search the NIH genetic sequence database, see GenBank
- For related information on conservation and images as well as observations see iNaturalist