- What is Amphibian Species of the World?
- How to cite
- How to use
- Structure of the taxonomic records
- Running log of additions and changes, 2025
- Logs of changes and additions, 2014–2024
- What is the right name?
- Curator's blog
- History of the project, 1980 to 2024
- Comments on amphibian taxonomy relating to versions 3.0 to 6.2 (2004 to 2024)
- Scientific Nomenclature and its Discontents: Comments by Frost on Rules and Philosophy of Taxonomy, Ranks, and Their Applications
- Contributors, online editions
- Contributors and reviewers for Amphibian Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (1985)
- Versions
- Museum abbreviations
- Links to useful amphibian systematic, conservation, collection management, informational, and/or regional sites
- Links to useful FREE library sites
- Copyright and terms of use
Ichthyophis glutinosus (Linnaeus, 1758)
Caecilia glutinosa Linnaeus, 1758, Syst. Nat., Ed. 10, 1: 229. Holotype: NHRM according to Andersson, 1899, Bih. K. Svenska Vetensk. Akad. Handl., 24 (IV, art. 6): 6, the animal figured by Linnaeus, 1754, Mus. Adophi Friderici, 1: 19, pl 4, fig. 1), now NHRM 163 according to museum records. (See http://linnaeus.nrm.se/zool/herp/madamph.html.en for image of type.) Type locality: "Habitat in Indiis". Placed on Official List of Specific Names in Zoology by Opinion 1604, Anonymous, 1990, Bull. Zool. Nomencl., 47: 166.
Coecilia viscosa Latreille In Sonnini de Manoncourt and Latreille, 1801 "An. X", Hist. Nat. Rept., 4: 238. Replacement name for Caecilia glutinosa. Synonymy by Duméril and Bibron, 1841, Erp. Gen., 6: 286; Gray, 1850, Cat. Spec. Amph. Coll. Brit. Mus., Batr. Grad.: 58.
Ichthyophis glutinosus — Fitzinger, 1826, Neue Class. Rept.: 36. Cantor, 1847, J. Asiat. Soc. Bengal, 16: 1058; Boulenger, 1882, Cat. Batr. Grad. Batr. Apoda Coll. Brit. Mus., Ed. 2: 89; Boulenger, 1890, Fauna Brit. India, Rept. Batr.: 515.
Epicrium glutinosum — Wagler, 1828, Isis von Oken, 21: 740-744. Duméril and Bibron, 1841, Erp. Gen., 6: 286.
Caecilia (Ichthyophis) glutinosa — Van der Hoeven, 1833, Handb. Dierkd., 2: 303, by implication.
Ichthyophis (Epicrium) glutinosus — Bourret, 1927, Fauna Indochine, Vert., 3: 252.
Ichthyophis forcarti Taylor, 1965, Univ. Kansas Sci. Bull., 46: 283. Holotype: NHMB 4411, by original designation. Type locality: "Ceylon" (= Sri Lanka). Synonymy by Nussbaum and Gans, 1983 "1980", Spolia Zeylan., 35: 144).
Common Names
White-bellied Caecilia (Cuvier, 1831, Animal Kingdom (M'Murtrie), 2: 74).
White-bellied Caecilian (Mathew and Sen, 2010, Pict. Guide Amph. NE India: 130).
Glutinous Caecilia (Gray, 1831, in Cuvier, Animal Kingdom (Griffith), 9—Appendix: 110).
Sticky Caecilian (Ananjeva, Borkin, Darevsky, and Orlov, 1988, Dict. Amph. Rept. Five Languages: 16).
Ceylon Caecilian (Frank and Ramus, 1995, Compl. Guide Scient. Common Names Amph. Rept. World: 25).
Common Yellow-banded Caecilian (de Silva, 2009, Amph. Rep. Sri Lanka Photograph. Guide: 129).
Distribution
Central and southern Sri Lanka.
Geographic Occurrence
Natural Resident: Sri Lanka
Endemic: Sri Lanka
Comment
See accounts by Nussbaum and Gans, 1983 "1980", Spolia Zeylan., 35: 137–154; Dutta and Manamendra-Arachchi, 1996, Amph. Fauna Sri Lanka: 18; and Dutta, 1997, Amph. India Sri Lanka: 22–23. Records of this species outside of the stated range are attributable to other species. Ravichandran, Gower, and Wilkinson, 2003, Zootaxa, 350: 6, doubted the Indian record of Pillai and Ravichandran, 1999, Rec. Zool. Surv. India, Occas. Pap., 172: 32–35, as did Dutta, 2003 "2002", Hamadryad, 27: 156–157, who discussed previous misidentifications on which records from India are based. Gower, Bahir, Mapatuna, Pethiyagoda, Raheem, and Wilkinson, 2005, Raffles Bull. Zool., Suppl., 12: 153–161, suggested that a cryptic species exists under this name from Wegela, Sri Lanka, which is more closely related to Ichthyophis orthoplicatus than to Ichthyophis glutinosus, with Ichthyophis forcarti possibly being the available name. D. Gower in Grismer and Pan, 2008, Herpetol. Rev., 39: 270–281, suggested that the taxonmic distinctiveness of Ichthyophis monochrous, Ichthyophis glutinosus, Ichthyophis singaporensis, and Ichthyophis paucisulcus needs confirmation via genetic analyses. Mathew and Sen, 2010, Pict. Guide Amph. NE India: 130–131, provided a brief characterization and photograph for specimens in northeastern India they allocated to this species. de Silva, 2009, Amph. Rep. Sri Lanka Photograph. Guide: 129, provided a brief account and color photograph for Sri Lanka. Bopage, Wewelwala, Krvavac, Jovanovic, Safarek, and Pushpamal, 2011, Salamandra, 47: 173–177, reported the species in lowland forest in the Kanneliya Forest of southwestern Sri Lanka.
External links:
Please note: these links will take you to external websites not affiliated with the American Museum of Natural History. We are not responsible for their content.
- For access to general information see Wikipedia
- For additional sources of general information from other websites search Google
- For access to relevant technical literature search Google Scholar
- For images search CalPhoto Images and Google Images
- To search the NIH genetic sequence database, see GenBank
- For additional information see AmphibiaWeb report
- For information on conservation status and distribution see the IUCN Redlist
- For information on distribution, habitat, and conservation see the Map of Life
- For related information on conservation and images as well as observations see iNaturalist