- Amphibian Species of the World on Twitter
- What is the right name?
- Curator's blog
- Running log of additions and changes, 2023
- Logs of changes and additions, 2014–2022
- How to cite
- How to use
- History of the project, 1980 to 2023
- Comments on amphibian taxonomy relating to versions 3.0 to 6.1 (2004 to 2023)
- Scientific Nomenclature and Its Discontents
- Structure of the taxonomic records
- Contributors and reviewers for Amphibian Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (1985)
- Contributors, online editions
- Versions
- Museum abbreviations
- Links to useful amphibian systematic, conservation, collection management, informational, and/or regional sites
- Links to useful FREE library sites
- Copyright and terms of use
Noblella Barbour, 1930
Noblella Barbour, 1930, Zoologica, New York, 11: 81. Type species: Sminthillus peruvianus Noble, 1921, by original designation.
Phyllonastes Heyer, 1977, Pap. Avulsos Zool., São Paulo, 31: 151. Type species: Euparkerella myrmecoides Lynch, 1976, by original designation. Synonymy by De la Riva, Chaparro, and Padial, 2008, Zootaxa, 1685: 55-66.
English Names
Heyer's Leaf Frogs (Phyllonastes [no longer recognized]: Frank and Ramus, 1995, Compl. Guide Scient. Common Names Amph. Rept. World: 83).
Distribution
Amazonian basin of southeastern Colombia, eastern Peru, northeastern Bolivia and adjacent Brazil; eastern slopes of the Andes of southern Ecuador through Peru to Bolivia.
Geographics occurrence
Natural resident: Bolivia, Brazil, Colombia, Ecuador, Peru
Comment
Removed from the synonymy of Phrynopus by De la Riva, Chaparro, and Padial, 2008, Zootaxa, 1685: 55–66 (who incorrectly cited Noblella as being in the synonymy of Eleutherodactylus, rather than Phrynopus), where it had been placed by Lynch, 1975, Occas. Pap. Mus. Nat. Hist. Univ. Kansas, 35: 8. See comment under Adelophryne. Duellman, 1991, Herpetologica, 47: 9–13, provided a key to the species of Phyllonastes. Lynch, 1986, J. Herpetol., 20: 423–431, suggested that Phyllonastes might be related to the Phrynopus peruvianus group. De la Riva and Köhler, 1998, J. Herpetol., 32: 328–329, suggested that the Phrynopus peruvianus group is likely paraphyletic with respect to Phyllonastes. Lehr, Fritzsch, and Müller, 2005, Zool. Scripta, 34: 593–603, confirmed the paraphyly of Phrynopus with respect to Phyllonastes, but did not act on this taxonomic problem. See comments under Phrynopus, Phrynopus bagrecito, and Phrynopus peruvianus. Cisneros-Heredia and Reynolds, 2007, Herpetozoa, Wien, 19: 184–186, mentioned at three unnamed species of Phyllonastes in Ecuador and two in Peru. See discussion by Hedges, Duellman, and Heinicke, 2008, Zootaxa, 1737: 102, who noted that the monophyly and relationships of this taxon remain unelucidated. Guayasamin and Terán-Valdez, 2009, Zootaxa, 2161: 47–59, provided a key to the species in the genus and discussed the ranges of the species. See Duellman and Lehr, 2009, Terrest.-breeding Frogs in Peru: 91–96, for brief accounts of the species in Peru. Pyron and Wiens, 2011, Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 61: 543–583, suggested that Noblella is polyphyletic, with one of their exemplars, Noblella peruviana being the sister taxon of Psychrophrynella and another, Noblella lochites, being the sister taxon of Barycholos. However, this specimen, KU 173495, has now been reidentified as Psychrophrynella usurpator (I. de la Riva and A. Catenazzi, personal commun., and Padial, Grant, and Frost, 2014, Zootaxa, 3825: 10). Reyes-Puig, Reyes-Puig, Ron, Ortega, Guayasamin, Goodrum, Recalde, Vieira, Koch, and Yánez-Muñoz, 2019, PeerJ, 7 (e7405) : 1–26, presented molecular evidence of the non-monophyly of this genus, but hesitated to make the taxonomic remedy due to the lack of critical genetic samples (including the type species of Noblella, Noblella peruvianus). Reyes-Puig, Maynard, Trageser, Vieira, Hamilton, Lynch, Culebras, Kohn, Brito-M., and Guayasamin, 2020, Neotropical Biodiversity, 6: 164, provided molecular evidence of polyphyly of Nobella, with a clade composed of Noblella coloma, Noblella worleyae, (Noblella ochites, Noblella personina, Noblella heyeri, Noblella mymercoides, and Noblella naturetrekii being the sister taxon of Ischnocnema and one sample of Noblella myrmecoides and Noblella pygmaea being more closely relates to Psychrophrynella, but continued to resist making any taxonomic change. Dubois, Ohler, and Pyron, 2021, Megataxa, 5: 435, resurrected Phyllonastes on the basis of Noblella peruviana not forming a monophyletic group with those species in their tree. Unfortunately, their example of Noblella peruviana is actually Psychrophrynella usurpator as noted above so they have yet to test the monophyly of Noblella. Reyes-Puig, Guayasamin, Koch, Brito-Zapata, Hollanders, Costales, and Cisneros-Heredia, 2021, Acta Herpetol., Firenze, 16: 63–87, provided a tree of 16s mtDNA that suggests that evidence for the monophyly of Noblella is absent, in their analysis with a (non-significant) resolution of Noblella thiuni, Noblella madreselva, Noblella usurpator, Noblella glauca, Noblella losamigos, and Noblella pygmaea forming a monophyletic group that is the sister taxon of Microkayla + Qosqophryne and the remainder of Noblella falling outside of that group + Bryophryne.
Contained taxa (17 sp.):
External links:
Please note: these links will take you to external websites not affiliated with the American Museum of Natural History. We are not responsible for their content.
- For additional sources of information from other sites search Google
- For images search CalPhoto Images and Google Images
- To search the NIH genetic sequence database, see GenBank
- For related information on conservation and images as well as observation see iNaturalist