- What is Amphibian Species of the World?
- How to cite
- How to use
- Structure of the taxonomic records
- Running log of additions and corrections, 2024
- Logs of changes and additions, 2014–2023
- What is the right name?
- Curator's blog
- Amphibian Species of the World on social media
- History of the project, 1980 to 2024
- Comments on amphibian taxonomy relating to versions 3.0 to 6.2 (2004 to 2024)
- Scientific Nomenclature and its Discontents: Comments by Frost on Rules and Philosophy of Taxonomy, Ranks, and Their Applications
- Contributors, online editions
- Contributors and reviewers for Amphibian Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (1985)
- Versions
- Museum abbreviations
- Links to useful amphibian systematic, conservation, collection management, informational, and/or regional sites
- Links to useful FREE library sites
- Copyright and terms of use
Nannophryne Günther, 1870
Nannophryne Günther, 1870, Proc. Zool. Soc. London, 1870: 402. Type species: Nannophryne variegata Günther, 1870, by monotypy.
Common Names
None noted.
Distribution
Central Andean Peru south in disjunct populations to southern Chile and adjacent Argentina.
Comment
Removed from the synonymy of Bufo by Frost, Grant, Faivovich, Bain, Haas, Haddad, de Sá, Channing, Wilkinson, Donnellan, Raxworthy, Campbell, Blotto, Moler, Drewes, Nussbaum, Lynch, Green, and Wheeler, 2006, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., 297: 129, on the basis of evidence provided by Pauly, Hillis, and Cannatella, 2004, Evolution, 58: 2517–2535. Previously placed in the synonymy with Phryniscus (= Atelopus) by Boulenger, 1894, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., Ser. 6, 14: 374; and with Bufo by Boulenger, 1882, Cat. Batr. Sal. Coll. Brit. Mus., Ed. 2: 281. Pramuk, 2006, Zool. J. Linn. Soc., 146: 425, placed Nannophryne cophotis (as Bufo cophotis), Nannophryne apolobambica (by implication), and Nannophryne corynetes (as Bufo corynetes) in her Bufo variegatus group (Nannophryne of this catalog). Chaparro, Pramuk, and Gluesenkamp, 2007, Herpetologica, 63: 203–212, recognized Nannophryne as the sister taxon of a group composed of other former South American "Bufo" as well various other Eurasian and African taxa (e.g., Duttaphrynus, Schismaderma, Ingerophrynus). Smith and Chiszar, 2006, Herpetol. Conserv. Biol., 1: 6–8, implied that this taxon should be considered a subgenus of Bufo; see comment under Bufonidae. Van Bocxlaer, Biju, Loader, and Bossuyt, 2009, BMC Evol. Biol., 9 (e131): 1–10, on the basis of a molecular study suggested that Nannophryne is the sister taxon of all bufonids, with the exception of Dendrophryniscus and Melanophryniscus (the atelopodines not having been included in their analysis). In a subsequent and more densely-sampled study Van Bocxlaer, Loader, Roelants, Biju, Menegon, and Bossuyt, 2010, Science, 327: 679–682, found Nannophryne to form the sister taxon of all bufonids, excluding Dendrophryniscus, Osornophryne, Atelopus, and Melanophryniscus. Pyron and Wiens, 2011, Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 61: 543–583, confirmed the monophyly of this taxon (although this is obscured by their explicit adoption of an out-dated and non-monophyletic taxonomy), and prior work regarding its phylogenetic placement. Fouquette and Dubois, 2014, Checklist N.A. Amph. Rept.: 290, considered Nannophryne as subgenus of Bufo, cherry-picking their citation to literature (excluding any reference to Van Bocxlaer, Biju, Loader, and Bossuyt, 2009, BMC Evol. Biol., 9 (e131): 1–10, Van Bocxlaer, Loader, Roelants, Biju, Menegon, and Bossuyt, 2010, Science, 327: 679–682, or Pyron and Wiens, 2011, Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 61: 543–583, which provided results not congruent with the story that Fouquette and Dubois wanted to tell) to avoid recognizing that treating this genus as a subgenus of Bufo also requires under current understanding of phylogeny all Old-World bufonids, such as Sabahphrynus, Nectophryne, and Ansonia to be treated as subgenera of Bufo as well.
Contained taxa (4 sp.):
External links:
Please note: these links will take you to external websites not affiliated with the American Museum of Natural History. We are not responsible for their content.
- For access to general information see Wikipedia
- For additional sources of general information from other websites search Google
- For access to relevant technical literature search Google Scholar
- For images search CalPhoto Images and Google Images
- To search the NIH genetic sequence database, see GenBank
- For related information on conservation and images as well as observations see iNaturalist