- What is Amphibian Species of the World?
- How to cite
- How to use
- Structure of the taxonomic records
- Running log of additions and corrections, 2024
- Logs of changes and additions, 2014–2023
- What is the right name?
- Curator's blog
- Amphibian Species of the World on social media
- History of the project, 1980 to 2024
- Comments on amphibian taxonomy relating to versions 3.0 to 6.2 (2004 to 2024)
- Scientific Nomenclature and its Discontents: Comments by Frost on Rules and Philosophy of Taxonomy, Ranks, and Their Applications
- Contributors, online editions
- Contributors and reviewers for Amphibian Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (1985)
- Versions
- Museum abbreviations
- Links to useful amphibian systematic, conservation, collection management, informational, and/or regional sites
- Links to useful FREE library sites
- Copyright and terms of use
Vitreorana ritae (Lutz, 1952)
Centrolene ritae Lutz in Lutz and Kloss, 1952, Mem. Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, 50: 658. Types: Formerly in MNRJ, now destroyed according to Duellman, 1977, Das Tierreich, 95: 195. MCZ 96522 (the holotype of Centrolenella ametarsia) designated neotype by Cisneros-Heredia, 2013, Avanc. Cienc. Ingen., Quito, Secc. B,, 5: B1. Type locality: "Benjamin Constant, Alto Solimões", Estado do Amazonas, Brazil. Neotype from "the headwaters of Río Caiwima, a tributary of the Río Amayaca-Yacu, ca. 70 km NNE Puerto Nariño, Amazonas, Colombia (approximately 3°20′S, 70°20′W)".
Centrolenella oyampiensis Lescure, 1975, Bull. Soc. Zool. France, 100: 386. Holotype: MNHNP 1973.1673, by original designation. Type locality: "village Zidok (Haut-Oyapock), Guyane française". Synonymy by Cisneros-Heredia, 2013, Avanc. Cienc. Ingen., Quito, Secc. B,, 5: B1.
Centrolenella ritae — Duellman, 1977, Das Tierreich, 95: ix, 195.
Cochranella ritae — Ruiz-Carranza and Lynch, 1991, Lozania, 57: 23.
Centrolenella ametarsia Flores, 1987, J. Herpetol., 21: 185. Holotype: MCZ 96522, by original designation. Type locality: "the headwaters of Río Caiwima, a tributary of the Río Amayaca-Yacu, ca. 70 km NNE Puerto Nariño, Amazonas, Colombia (approximately 3°20′S, 70°20′W)". Synonymy with Centrolenella oyampiensis by Guayasamin, Cisneros-Heredia, and Castroviejo-Fisher, 2008, Zootaxa, 1815: 28.
Cochranella ametarsia — Ruiz-Carranza and Lynch, 1991, Lozania, 57: 21; Savage, 2002, Amph. Rept. Costa Rica: 365.
Cochranella oyampiensis — Ruiz-Carranza and Lynch, 1991, Lozania, 57: 22.
Vitreorana oyampiensis — Guayasamin, Castroviejo-Fisher, Trueb, Ayarzagüena, Rada, and Vilà, 2009, Zootaxa, 2100: 39.
"Cochranella" ritae — Guayasamin, Castroviejo-Fisher, Trueb, Ayarzagüena, Rada, and Vilà, 2009, Zootaxa, 2100: 58.
Vitreorana ritae — Cisneros-Heredia, 2013, Avanc. Cienc. Ingen., Quito, Secc. B,, 5: B1.
Common Names
Rita's Cochran Frog (Frank and Ramus, 1995, Compl. Guide Scient. Common Names Amph. Rept. World: 47).
Zidok Cochran Frog (Vitreorana oyampiensis [no longer recognized]: (Frank and Ramus, 1995, Compl. Guide Scient. Common Names Amph. Rept. World: 47).
Headwater Cochran Frog (Cochranella ametarsia [no longer recognized]: Frank and Ramus, 1995, Compl. Guide Scient. Common Names Amph. Rept. World: 46).
Rita's Glassfrog (Guayasamin, Cisneros-Heredia, McDiarmid, Peña, and Hutter, 2020, Diversity, 12 (222): 245).
Distribution
Known from two localities in the Amazonian lowlands (below 300 m elevation) of Orellana Province, eastern Ecuador; Amazonas, Colombia, and one locality in Amazonian Peru (Loreto) and Provincia Roman, Departamento Pando, Bolivia; eastern Suriname, French Guiana, and in Brazil from Roraima and Amapá south to extreme western Amazonas and the municipalities of Cotriguaçu and Sinop, Mato Grosso, and east to Amapá and central Pará, Brazil; expected in southern Guyana and Guianan Venezuela.
Geographic Occurrence
Natural Resident: Bolivia, Brazil, Colombia, Ecuador, French Guiana, Peru, Suriname
Likely/Controversially Present: Guyana, Venezuela
Comment
In the Cochranella ocellata group, according to Ruiz-Carranza and Lynch, 1991, Lozania, 57: 1-30. Zimmerman, 1983, Herpetologica, 39: 235–246, and Zimmerman and Bogart, 1984, Acta Amazonica, 14: 473–520, reported on vocalization. Placed in the Cochranella spinosa group by Savage, 2002, Amph. Rept. Costa Rica: 365. See comment under Cochranella resplendens. Guayasamin, Castroviejo-Fisher, Trueb, Ayarzagüena, Rada, and Vilà, 2009, Zootaxa, 2100: 39, suggested that this is a likely senior synonym of Vitreorana oyampiensis. Cisneros-Heredia, 2013, Avanc. Cienc. Ingen., Quito, Secc. B,, 5: B1, made the formal synonymy. Moraes, Almeida, Fraga, Rojas-Zamora, Pirani, Silva, Carvalho, Gordo, and Werneck, 2017, ZooKeys, 715: 103–159, reported on specimens from the Serra da Mocidade, state of Roraima, northern Brazil. Muñoz-Saravia and Aguayo-Vedia, 2009, Cuad. Herpetol., 23: 97–99, provided a record from the Provincia Roman, Departamento Pando, Bolivia (as Vitreorana oyampiensis). Menin, Lima, and Rodrigues, 2009, Zootaxa, 2203: 65–68, reported on larval morphology (as Vitreorana oyampiensis). Fouquet, Vidal, and Dewynter, 2019, Zoosystema, 41: 366, were dubious of the synonymy of Vitreorana oyampiensis. For identification of larvae (as Centrolenella oyampiensis) in central Amazonia, Brazil, see Hero, 1990, Amazoniana, 11: 201–262. Metcalf, Marsh, Torres Pacaya, Graham, and Gunnels, 2020, Herpetol. Notes, 13: 753–767, reported the species from the Santa Cruz Forest Reserve, Loreto, northeastern Peru. Guayasamin, Cisneros-Heredia, McDiarmid, Peña, and Hutter, 2020, Diversity, 12 (222): 245–250, provided a detailed account, including adult and larval morphology, advertisement call, relationships, natural history, and conservation status. Penhacek, Anjos, Araujo de Oliveira, Hernández-Ruz, Rodrigues, Guerra Batista, and Rodrigues, 2020, Caldasia, 42: 171–180, reported on localities in Mato Grosso, Brazil, inferred from molecular and acoustic evidence and provided photographs and a brief characterization of the larvae. Costa-Campos, Figueiredo, Lima, and Lima, 2020, Herpetol. Notes, 13: 733–737, provided new records for Amapá, Brazil, and provided a dot map of the distribution. Taucce, Costa-Campos, Carvalho, and Michalski, 2022, Eur. J. Taxon., 836: 96–130, reported on distribution, literature, and conservation status for Amapá, Brazil. Not included in the Venezuela fauna by Barrio-Amorós, Rojas-Runjaic, and Señaris, 2019, Amph. Rept. Conserv., 13 (1: e180): 1–198, but possibly to be found in the Guianan highlands of east-central Venezuela. Schiesari, Rossa-Feres, Menin, and Hödl, 2022, Zootaxa, 5223: 34–36, detailed larval and metamorph morphology and natural history in central Amazonia, Brazil. Lescure, Dewynter, Frétey, Ineich, Ohler, Vidal, and De Massary, 2022, Bull. Soc. Herpetol. France, 181(5): 1–17, confirmed the species in French Guiana.
External links:
Please note: these links will take you to external websites not affiliated with the American Museum of Natural History. We are not responsible for their content.
- For access to general information see Wikipedia
- For additional sources of general information from other websites search Google
- For access to relevant technical literature search Google Scholar
- For images search CalPhoto Images and Google Images
- To search the NIH genetic sequence database, see GenBank
- For additional information see AmphibiaWeb report
- For information on conservation status and distribution see the IUCN Redlist
- For information on distribution, habitat, and conservation see the Map of Life
- For related information on conservation and images as well as observations see iNaturalist
- For additional information specific to Ecuador see FaunaWebEcuador: Anfibios del Ecuador
- For access to available specimen data for this species, from over 350 scientific collections, go to Vertnet.