- What is Amphibian Species of the World?
- How to cite
- How to use
- Structure of the taxonomic records
- Running log of additions and corrections, 2024
- Logs of changes and additions, 2014–2023
- What is the right name?
- Curator's blog
- Amphibian Species of the World on social media
- History of the project, 1980 to 2024
- Comments on amphibian taxonomy relating to versions 3.0 to 6.2 (2004 to 2024)
- Scientific Nomenclature and its Discontents: Comments by Frost on Rules and Philosophy of Taxonomy, Ranks, and Their Applications
- Contributors, online editions
- Contributors and reviewers for Amphibian Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (1985)
- Versions
- Museum abbreviations
- Links to useful amphibian systematic, conservation, collection management, informational, and/or regional sites
- Links to useful FREE library sites
- Copyright and terms of use
Hyalinobatrachium mondolfii Señaris and Ayarzagüena, 2001
Hyalinobatrachium mondolfii Señaris and Ayarzagüena, 2001, Rev. Biol. Tropical, 49: 1084. Holotype: MHNLS 12710, by original designation. Type locality: "Primer Raudal del Caño Acoima, afluente del Río Grande (8° 22′ N, 61° 32′ W), 15 msnm., estribaciones de la Serranía de Imataca, Estado Delta Amacuro, Venezuela".
Common Names
None noted.
Distribution
Two poorly delimited areas: (1) Leticia, Amazonas, and La Montanita, Caquetá, Colombia; Acre, Brazil; and the Department of Pando in northern Bolivia; and (2) Pará and Amapá, Brazil; Guyana, southern Surinam, and Caño Acoima and Caño Jotajana in the state of Delta Amacuro and along the Río Guarapiche in the state of Monagas, Venezuela; reported in Amazonian Peru at Las Piedras Amazon Center, Tambopata Province, Madre de Dios Department, 207 mm elevation.
Geographic Occurrence
Natural Resident: Bolivia, Brazil, Colombia, French Guiana, Guyana, Peru, Suriname, Venezuela
Comment
In the Hyalinobatrachium fleischmanni group according to the original publication. Señaris and Ayarzagüena, 2005, Rev. Taxonom. Fam. Centrolenidae de Venezuela: 200-207, provided a review of the morphology, natural history, and range of this species. Castroviejo-Fisher, Moravec, Aparicio, Guerrero-Reinhard, and Calderón, 2011, Zootaxa, 2798: 64-68, verified a record for Departamento Pando, Bolivia, by molecular analysis and noted that it seems to be impossible to distinguish this species from Hyalinobatrachium munozorum and Hyalinobatrachium ruedai on the basis of morphological characteristics. Castroviejo-Fisher, Vilà, Ayarzagüena, Blanc, and Ernst, 2011, Zootaxa, 3132: 1-55, provided a detailed account. See Cole, Townsend, Reynolds, MacCulloch, and Lathrop, 2013, Proc. Biol. Soc. Washington, 125: 383, for brief account and records for Guyana. Venâncio, Souza, and Kokubum, 2014, Check List, 10: 1184–1186 , provided a range extension to Acre, Brazil, and a spot distribution map. Fouquet, Vacher, Kadosoe, Jairam, and Ouboter, 2015, Herpetol. Notes, 8: 63–68, reported the species from the Sipaliwini Nature Reserve, southern Surinam. Araujo de Oliveira, Hernández-Ruz, and Carvalho, 2015, Herpetol. Rev., 46: 377–378, provided a record for extreme northern Pará. See Barrio-Amorós, Rojas-Runjaic, and Señaris, 2019, Amph. Rept. Conserv., 13 (1: e180): 25, for comments on range and literature. Chávez, Pradel, and Catenazzi, 2019, Zootaxa, 4691: 543, reported the species from Peru. Señaris and Rojas-Runjaic, 2020, in Rull and Carnaval (eds.), Neotrop. Divers. Patterns Process.: 571–632, commented on range and conservation status in the Venezuelan Guayana. Figueiredo, Tavares-Pinheiro, Pinheiro-Freitas, Dias-Souza, and Costa-Campos, 2020, Check List, 16: 1369–1374, reported the species from the municipality of Municipality of Serra do Navio, state of Amapá, Brazil. Díaz-Ricaurte and Guevara-Molina, 2022, Stud. Neotrop. Fauna Environ., 57: 51–65, provided a record from La Montañita, Caquetá, Colombia, 276 m elevation, and provided natural history notes. Taucce, Costa-Campos, Carvalho, and Michalski, 2022, Eur. J. Taxon., 836: 96–130, reported on distribution, literature, and conservation status for Amapá, Brazil. Lescure, Dewynter, Frétey, Ineich, Ohler, Vidal, and De Massary, 2022, Bull. Soc. Herpetol. France, 181(5): 1–7, confirmed the species in French Guiana.
External links:
Please note: these links will take you to external websites not affiliated with the American Museum of Natural History. We are not responsible for their content.
- For access to general information see Wikipedia
- For additional sources of general information from other websites search Google
- For access to relevant technical literature search Google Scholar
- For images search CalPhoto Images and Google Images
- To search the NIH genetic sequence database, see GenBank
- For additional information see AmphibiaWeb report
- For information on conservation status and distribution see the IUCN Redlist
- For information on distribution, habitat, and conservation see the Map of Life
- For related information on conservation and images as well as observations see iNaturalist
- For access to available specimen data for this species, from over 350 scientific collections, go to Vertnet.