- What is Amphibian Species of the World?
- How to cite
- How to use
- Structure of the taxonomic records
- Running log of additions and corrections, 2024
- Logs of changes and additions, 2014–2023
- What is the right name?
- Curator's blog
- Amphibian Species of the World on social media
- History of the project, 1980 to 2024
- Comments on amphibian taxonomy relating to versions 3.0 to 6.2 (2004 to 2024)
- Scientific Nomenclature and its Discontents: Comments by Frost on Rules and Philosophy of Taxonomy, Ranks, and Their Applications
- Contributors, online editions
- Contributors and reviewers for Amphibian Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (1985)
- Versions
- Museum abbreviations
- Links to useful amphibian systematic, conservation, collection management, informational, and/or regional sites
- Links to useful FREE library sites
- Copyright and terms of use
Sphenophryne Peters and Doria, 1878
Sphenophryne Peters and Doria, 1878, Ann. Mus. Civ. Stor. Nat. Genova, 13: 430. Type species: Sphenophryne cornuta Peters and Doria, 1878, by monotypy.
Genyophryne Boulenger, 1890, Proc. Zool. Soc. London, 1890: 326. Type species: Genyophryne thomsoni Boulenger, 1890, by monotypy. Synonymy by Rivera, Kraus, Allison, and Butler, 2017, Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 112: 4.
Liophryne Boulenger, 1897, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., Ser. 6, 19: 11. Type species: Liophryne rhododactyla Boulenger, 1897, by subsequent designation of Parker, 1934, Monogr. Frogs Fam. Microhylidae: 152. Synonymy by Rivera, Kraus, Allison, and Butler, 2017, Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 112: 4.
Oxydactyla Van Kampen, 1913, Nova Guinea, 9: 464. Type species: Oxydactyla brevicrus Van Kampen, 1913, by monotypy. Synonymy by Rivera, Kraus, Allison, and Butler, 2017, Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 112: 4.
Common Names
Land Frogs (Sphenophryne: Frank and Ramus, 1995, Compl. Guide Scient. Common Names Amph. Rept. World: 92).
Toothless Frogs (Genyophryne [no longer recognized: Frank and Ramus, 1995, Compl. Guide Scient. Common Names Amph. Rept. World: 89).
Distribution
New Guinea.
Comment
Rivera, Kraus, Allison, and Butler, 2017, Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 112: 1–11, provided a phylogenetic analysis of the Asterophryinae, and placed Genyophryne, Oxydactyla, and Liophryne into synonymy to render a monophyletic taxonomy.
Revision of Sphenophryne in Zweifel, 2000, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., 253: 1–130. Köhler and Günther, 2008, Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 47: 353–365, suggested on the basis of molecular evidence that this taxon is the possible sister taxon of Liophryne dentata. Pyron and Wiens, 2011, Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 61: 543–583, confirmed this result.
Oxydactylus was removed from the synonymy of Sphenophryne by Zweifel, 2000, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., 253: 74, where it had been placed by Parker, 1934, Monogr. Frogs Fam. Microhylidae: 152; Loveridge, 1948, Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool., 101: 422. Revision of Oxydactyla in Zweifel, 2000, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., 253: 1–130. Köhler and Günther, 2008, Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 47: 353–ƒ365, suggested on the basis of molecular evidence that Oxydactyla is part of a monophyletic group containing Liophryne rhododactyla, Liophryne dentata, and Sphenophryne. Pyron and Wiens, 2011, Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 61: 543–583, came to a different conclusion; see comment under Liophryne.
Köhler and Günther, 2008, Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 47: 353–365, suggested on the basis of molecular evidence that Genyophryne is relatively basal in the asterophryine tree and possibly the sister taxon of Liophryne schlaginhaufeni. Pyron and Wiens, 2011, Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 61: 543–583, confirmed this result.
Liophryne was removed from the synonymy of Sphenophryne by Zweifel, 2000, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., 253: 56, where it had been placed by Parker, 1934, Monogr. Frogs Fam. Microhylidae: 152. Revision in Zweifel, 2000, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., 253: 1–130. Köhler and Günther, 2008, Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 47: 353–365, found Liophryne to be deeply polyphyletic, with Liophryne schlaginhaufeni to be near the base of Asterophryinae and Liophryne rhododactyla and Liophryne dentata to form a nonmonophyletic group with a monophyletic group with Oxydactyla and Sphenophryne. Pyron and Wiens, 2011, Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 61: 543–583, suggested that Liophryne schlaginhaufeni is the sister taxon of Genyophryne thompsoni and Liophryne rhododactylus is the sister taxon of a group composed of Liophryne dentata, Xenorhina obesa (rendering Xenorhina polyphyletic), Sphenophryne cornuta, and Hylophorbus rufescens. Dubois, Ohler, and Pyron, 2021, Megataxa, 5: 418, recovered Sphenophryne to be polyphyletic, one species, Sphenophryne schlaginhaufeni extending from near the base of asterophryines and a distant monophyletic group, composed of Sphenophryne cornuta, Sphenophryne crassa, Sphenophryne dentata, and Sphenophryne rhododactyla. In response to the chaotic non-monophyly of most of the asterophryine genera, these authors place all genera that they had sampled, other than Gastrophrynoides, into the synonymy of Asterophrys.
Contained taxa (15 sp.):
External links:
Please note: these links will take you to external websites not affiliated with the American Museum of Natural History. We are not responsible for their content.
- For access to general information see Wikipedia
- For additional sources of general information from other websites search Google
- For access to relevant technical literature search Google Scholar
- For images search CalPhoto Images and Google Images
- To search the NIH genetic sequence database, see GenBank
- For related information on conservation and images as well as observations see iNaturalist