- What is Amphibian Species of the World?
- How to cite
- How to use
- Structure of the taxonomic records
- Running log of additions and changes, 2025
- Logs of changes and additions, 2014–2024
- What is the right name?
- Curator's blog
- History of the project, 1980 to 2024
- Comments on amphibian taxonomy relating to versions 3.0 to 6.2 (2004 to 2024)
- Scientific Nomenclature and its Discontents: Comments by Frost on Rules and Philosophy of Taxonomy, Ranks, and Their Applications
- Contributors, online editions
- Contributors and reviewers for Amphibian Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (1985)
- Versions
- Museum abbreviations
- Links to useful amphibian systematic, conservation, collection management, informational, and/or regional sites
- Links to useful FREE library sites
- Copyright and terms of use
Glandirana rugosa (Temminck and Schlegel, 1838)
Rana rugosa Temminck and Schlegel, 1838, Fauna Japonica, 3: 110. Syntypes: Not stated but clearly including animls figured on pl. 3, fig. 3, 4 of the original publication; considered by M. Hoogmoed In Hu, 1985, in Frost (ed.), Amph. Species World: 457, to include RMNH 2064 (9 specimens); BMNH animals reported by Boulenger, 1882, Cat. Batr. Sal. Coll. Brit. Mus., Ed. 2: 35, received on exchange from "Leyden Museum" from Japan should be investigated as possible types. Type locality: "Japon"; probably Nagasaki, according to Stejneger, 1907, Bull. U.S. Natl. Mus., 58: 123. Restricted to "Nagasaki", Japan, by Gee and Boring, 1929, Peking Nat. Hist. Bull., 4: 32.
Rana (Rana) rugosa — Nakamura and Ueno, 1963, Japan. Rept. Amph. Color: 49; Dubois, 1987 "1986", Alytes, 5: 42.
Rana (Rugosa) rugosa — Dubois, 1992, Bull. Mens. Soc. Linn. Lyon, 61: 322.
Glandirana rugosa — Frost, Grant, Faivovich, Bain, Haas, Haddad, de Sá, Channing, Wilkinson, Donnellan, Raxworthy, Campbell, Blotto, Moler, Drewes, Nussbaum, Lynch, Green, and Wheeler, 2006, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., 297: 368.
Rugosa rugosa — Fei, Ye, and Jiang, 2010, Herpetol. Sinica, 12: 37. See comment under Ranidae record.
Common Names
Wrinkled Frog (Frank and Ramus, 1995, Compl. Guide Scient. Common Names Amph. Rept. World: 109; Maeda and Matsui, 1990, Frogs Toads Japan, Ed. 2: 99; Goris and Maeda, 2004, Guide Amph. Rept. Japan: 92).
Japanese Wrinkled Frog (Ananjeva, Borkin, Darevsky, and Orlov, 1988, Dict. Amph. Rept. Five Languages: 128).
Distribution
Honshu (except for the northeast-central part), Shikoku, and Kyushu Islands, Japan; introduced throughout Hawaii, USA.
Geographic Occurrence
Natural Resident: Japan
Endemic: Japan
Introduced: United States of America, United States of America - Hawaii
Comment
In the Rana rugosa group of Dubois, 1987 "1986", Alytes, 5: 42. Section Pelophylax, subgenus Rugosa, according to Dubois, 1992, Bull. Mens. Soc. Linn. Lyon, 61: 322. See Stejneger, 1907, Bull. U.S. Natl. Mus., 58: 123–127, and Okada, 1966, Fauna Japon., Anura: 104–112, for review. See comments under Glandirana tientaiensis and Glandirana emeljanovi. Matsui and Wilkinson, 1992, J. Herpetol., 26: 9–16, discussed relationships of Rana rugosa. Nishioka, Kodama, Sumida, and Ryuzaki, 1993, Sci. Rep. Lab. Amph. Biol. Hiroshima Univ., 12: 83–131, provided evidence that four cryptic species existed in Japan under this name. Highton, 2000, in Bruce et al., Biol. Plethodontid Salamanders: 235, suggested that 3–4 species would be elucidated within this complex. Maeda and Matsui, 1990, Frogs Toads Japan, Ed. 2: 96–99, provided an account. Lever, 2003, Naturalized Rept. Amph. World: 224–225, reported on the introduced population in Hawaii. Hasegawa, Ueda, and Sumida, 1999, Herpetologica, 55: 318–324, reported on clinal geographic variation in the advertisement call. Goris and Maeda, 2004, Guide Amph. Rept. Japan: 92–94, provided an account for Japan, map, and photograph. Miura, Sekiya, Ohtani, Ogata, and Ichikawa, 2004, Zool. Sci., Tokyo, 21: 1271, documented sympatry of two genetically and reproductive distinct populations of "Rana rugosa" on Sado Island, off the west coast of Honshu I., Japan. Ogata, Hasegawa, Ohtani, Mineyama, and Miura, 2008, Heredity, 100: 92–99, discussed XX/WY and ZZ/ZW sex-chromosome-type populations in Japan, suggested at least four lineages in Japan that might be species. Sekiya, Ohtani, Ogata, and Miura, 2010, Curr. Herpetol., Kyoto, 29: 69–78, reported on karyology and more evidence of, minimally, the Sado Island population as a distinct species, with two other populations being the result of hybridization between the 2 species of nominal "Rana rugosa" within Japan. Ohtani, Sekiya, Ogata, and Miura, 2012, J. Herpetol., 46: 325–330, reported that the Sado Island population is reproductively isolated from the mainland "Rana rugosa". Kraus, 2005, in Lannoo (ed.), Amph. Declines: 580–581, and Dodd, 2013, Frogs U.S. and Canada, 2: 819–821, provided detailed accounts that summarized the relevant literature with special reference to the introduced Hawaii, USA, populations and noted that multiple introduced species may be involved. Shimada, 2015, Curr. Herpetol., Kyoto, 34: 80–84, compared iris color patter to that in Grandirana susurra. Altig and McDiarmid, 2015, Handb. Larval Amph. US and Canada: 221–222, provided an account of larval morphology and biology. Shimada, Matsui, Ogata, Miura, Tange, Min, and Eto, 2022, Zootaxa, 5174: 25–45, redelimited the species with the naming of Glandirana religuia from northeast-central Honshu, Japan. Introduced populations in Hawaii, USA, discussed and mapped to island by Meshaka, Collins, Bury, and McCallum, 2022, Exotic Amph. Rept. USA: 45–47.
External links:
Please note: these links will take you to external websites not affiliated with the American Museum of Natural History. We are not responsible for their content.
- For access to general information see Wikipedia
- For additional sources of general information from other websites search Google
- For access to relevant technical literature search Google Scholar
- For images search CalPhoto Images and Google Images
- To search the NIH genetic sequence database, see GenBank
- For additional information see AmphibiaWeb report
- For information on conservation status and distribution see the IUCN Redlist
- For information on distribution, habitat, and conservation see the Map of Life
- For related information on conservation and images as well as observations see iNaturalist