- What is Amphibian Species of the World?
- How to cite
- How to use
- Structure of the taxonomic records
- Running log of additions and corrections, 2024
- Logs of changes and additions, 2014–2023
- What is the right name?
- Curator's blog
- Amphibian Species of the World on social media
- History of the project, 1980 to 2024
- Comments on amphibian taxonomy relating to versions 3.0 to 6.2 (2004 to 2024)
- Scientific Nomenclature and its Discontents: Comments by Frost on Rules and Philosophy of Taxonomy, Ranks, and Their Applications
- Contributors, online editions
- Contributors and reviewers for Amphibian Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (1985)
- Versions
- Museum abbreviations
- Links to useful amphibian systematic, conservation, collection management, informational, and/or regional sites
- Links to useful FREE library sites
- Copyright and terms of use
Brachytarsophrys Tian and Hu, 1983
Brachytarsophrys Tian and Hu, 1983, Acta Herpetol. Sinica, Chengdu, N.S.,, 2 (2): 42, 47. Type species: Leptobrachium carinensis Boulenger, 1899, by original designation.
Brachytarsophrys — Dubois, 1987 "1986", Alytes, 5: 23; Mahony, Foley, Biju, and Teeling, 2017, Mol. Biol. Evol., 34: 754. Treatment as a subgenus of Megophrys.
Brachytarsophrys — Zhao and Adler, 1993, Herpetol. China: 116; Jiang, Yuan, Xie, and Zheng, 2003, Zool. Res., Kunming, 24: 246. Chen, Zhou, Poyarkov, Stuart, Brown, Lathrop, Wang, Yuan, Jiang, Hou, Chen, Suwannapoom, Nguyen, Duong, Papenfuss, Murphy, Zhang, and Che, 2017, Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 106: 29. Treatment as a genus.
Common Names
Karin Hills Frogs (Frank and Ramus, 1995, Compl. Guide Scient. Common Names Amph. Rept. World: 85).
Short-Legged Toads (Li, Zhang, Lyu, Wang, Li, Liu, Chen, Rao, Jin, Zhang, and Wang, 2020, Zool. Res., Kunming: 113).
Distribution
Southern China, Myanmar, Vietnam, Laos, and northern Thailand.
Comment
Considered a subgenus of Megophrys by Dubois, 1987 "1986", Alytes, 5: 23, but retained as a genus by Zhao and Adler, 1993, Herpetol. China: 116. Rao and Yang, 1997, Asiat. Herpetol. Res., 7: 103–107, discussed systematics and distribution of the species. Xie and Wang, 2000, Cultum Herpetol. Sinica, 8: 356–370, discussed evidence of the monophyly of this taxon as well as character conflict regarding the monophyly of this taxon. Xu, 2005, Sichuan J. Zool., 24: 337–339, rejected this taxon on karyological grounds. Fei, Hu, Ye, and Huang, 2009, Fauna Sinica, Amph. 2: 329–346, provided a key and accounts for the Chinese species. See comment under Megophryidae. Pyron and Wiens, 2011, Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 61: 543–583, noted the paraphyly of Xenophrys (now redelimited–DRF) with respect to this taxon. The genus was reviewed, an identification key provided, and species groups delimited by molecular and morphological evidence by Li, Zhang, Lyu, Wang, Li, Liu, Chen, Rao, Jin, Zhang, and Wang, 2020, Zool. Res., Kunming: 105–122, these being the Brachytarsophrys carinense group (Brachytarsophrys carinense, Brachytarsophrys intermedia) and the Brachytarsophrys feae group (Brachytarsophrys chuannanensis, Brachytarsophrys feae, Brachytarsophrys orientalis, Brachytarsophrys platyparietus, and Brachytarsophrys popei [with Brachytarsophrys qiannanensis recently included). These groups were also recognized by Qi, Lyu, Wang, Mo, Zeng, Zeng, Dai, Li, Grismer, and Wang, 2021, Zootaxa, 5072: 430, and Lyu, Qi, Wang, Zhang, Zhao, Zeng, Wan, Yang, Mo, and Wang, 2023, Zool. Res., Kunming, 44: 380–450.
Contained taxa (9 sp.):
External links:
Please note: these links will take you to external websites not affiliated with the American Museum of Natural History. We are not responsible for their content.
- For access to general information see Wikipedia
- For additional sources of general information from other websites search Google
- For access to relevant technical literature search Google Scholar
- For images search CalPhoto Images and Google Images
- To search the NIH genetic sequence database, see GenBank