- What is Amphibian Species of the World?
- How to cite
- How to use
- Structure of the taxonomic records
- Running log of additions and changes, 2025
- Logs of changes and additions, 2014–2024
- What is the right name?
- Curator's blog
- History of the project, 1980 to 2024
- Comments on amphibian taxonomy relating to versions 3.0 to 6.2 (2004 to 2024)
- Scientific Nomenclature and its Discontents: Comments by Frost on Rules and Philosophy of Taxonomy, Ranks, and Their Applications
- Contributors, online editions
- Contributors and reviewers for Amphibian Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (1985)
- Versions
- Museum abbreviations
- Links to useful amphibian systematic, conservation, collection management, informational, and/or regional sites
- Links to useful FREE library sites
- Copyright and terms of use
Copiula Méhely, 1901
Copiula Méhely, 1901, Termés. Füzetek, 24: 193, 242. Type species: Phrynixalus oxyrhinus Boulenger, 1898, by monotypy.
Common Names
Mehely Frogs (Frank and Ramus, 1995, Compl. Guide Scient. Common Names Amph. Rept. World: 89).
Distribution
New Guinea.
Comment
See Menzies and Tyler, 1977, J. Zool., London, 183: 431–464, for revision. The systematic status of Copiula, outside of the area covered by Menzies and Tyler, eastern Papua New Guinea, is unresolved according to Zweifel, 1985, in Frost (ed.), Amph. Species World: 367. Burton, 1990, Trans. R. Soc. S. Aust., 114: 87–93, discussed the diagnosis of the genus. Köhler and Günther, 2008, Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 47: 353–365, suggested on the basis of molecular evidence that Copiula is nonmonophyletic with a group containing Copiula obsti and Copiula pipiens forming the sister taxon of a group containing Austrochaperina derongo, and a group containing Copiula major forming the sister taxon of an unnamed Austrochaperina species. Pyron and Wiens, 2011, Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 61: 543–583, confirmed this result. Dubois, Ohler, and Pyron, 2021, Megataxa, 5: 418, found Copiula (including the type species) to be basal and paraphyletic to the rest of asterophryines, except for Gastrophrynoides, and as a distantly related small clade deep in the tree, far from the base (composed of Copiula guttata, Copiula derongo, Copiula obsti, Copiula pipiens). Essentially, because so many of the asterophryine genera (e.g., Cophixalus, Sphenophryne, Asterophrys) were behaving that way in their analysis that they place all asterophryine genera within Asterophrys. Hill, Fraser, Gao, Jarman, Henry, Iova, Allison, and Butler, 2022, Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 177 (107618): 1–15, with more densely sample taxa found Copiula to largely be monophyletic with the exception of Copiula tyleri which they recovered as deeply imbedded within part B of their polyphyletic Austrochaperina,0 and their Copiula sp. 7, which they found imbedded within Cophixalus. They suggested no taxonomic remedies but instead recommended that the specimens involved required more study.
Contained taxa (15 sp.):
External links:
Please note: these links will take you to external websites not affiliated with the American Museum of Natural History. We are not responsible for their content.
- For access to general information see Wikipedia
- For additional sources of general information from other websites search Google
- For access to relevant technical literature search Google Scholar
- For images search CalPhoto Images and Google Images
- To search the NIH genetic sequence database, see GenBank
- For related information on conservation and images as well as observations see iNaturalist