- What is Amphibian Species of the World?
- How to cite
- How to use
- Structure of the taxonomic records
- Running log of additions and changes, 2025
- Logs of changes and additions, 2014–2024
- What is the right name?
- Curator's blog
- History of the project, 1980 to 2024
- Comments on amphibian taxonomy relating to versions 3.0 to 6.2 (2004 to 2024)
- Scientific Nomenclature and its Discontents: Comments by Frost on Rules and Philosophy of Taxonomy, Ranks, and Their Applications
- Contributors, online editions
- Contributors and reviewers for Amphibian Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (1985)
- Versions
- Museum abbreviations
- Links to useful amphibian systematic, conservation, collection management, informational, and/or regional sites
- Links to useful FREE library sites
- Copyright and terms of use
Cardioglossa Boulenger, 1900
Cardioglossa Boulenger, 1900, Proc. Zool. Soc. London, 1900: 445. Type species: Cardioglossa gracilis Boulenger, 1900, by monotypy.
Common Names
Long-fingered Frogs (Frank and Ramus, 1995, Compl. Guide Scient. Common Names Amph. Rept. World: 37).
Distribution
Forested areas of western and central Africa.
Comment
In Arthroleptini of Frost, Grant, Faivovich, Bain, Haas, Haddad, de Sá, Channing, Wilkinson, Donnellan, Raxworthy, Campbell, Blotto, Moler, Drewes, Nussbaum, Lynch, Green, and Wheeler, 2006, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., 297: 336. Amiet, 1982, Ann. Fac. Sci. Cameroun, 28: 117-131, presented a dendrogram of the Cameroonian species in this genus. Amiet, 1972, Biol. Gabonica, 8: 201-234, described five new species. See comment under Arthroleptis. Considered by Noble, 1922, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., 46: 1-87, and Laurent, 1941 "1940", Rev. Zool. Bot. Afr., 34: 91, to be derived from a group containing Arthroleptis wahlbergi and Arthroleptis variabilis, although this is not consistent with recent findings. Amiet, 1972, Science et Nature, 14: 11-24, provided a pictorial summary of the species of Cameroon. Blackburn, 2008, Zool. J. Linn. Soc., 154: 611-630, discussed morphological diversity in the genus, noted that inclusion of Cardioglossa aureoli probably renders Cardioglossa paraphyletic, recognized five similarity groupings, and provided a key to the species. Blackburn, 2008, Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 49: 806-826, subsequently transferred Cardioglossa aureoli into Arthroleptis. Channing, Rödel, and Channing, 2012, Tadpoles of Africa: 93–99, reported on comparative tadpole morphology. Channing and Rödel, 2019, Field Guide Frogs & Other Amph. Afr.: 240–245, provided brief accounts, photographs, and range maps for the species. Dubois, Ohler, and Pyron, 2021, Megataxa, 5: 415, found Cardioglossa (their exemplars being Cardioglossa occidentalis and Cardioglossa schioetzi) within their Astylosternus clade. This differs considerably from the results of Frost et al. (2006) and Portik and Blackburn, 2016, Evolution, 70: 2017–2032, who provided evidence for the more traditional arrangement under very different assumptions of analysis. Dubois et al. (2021) placed Cardioglossa (Arthroleptinae) as a synonym of Astylosternus (Astylosterninae). Pretty clearly, the change Dubois, Ohler, and Pyron (2021) recommended was premature and possibly the result of misidentified terminals (DRF). Blackburn, Nielsen, Ghose, Burger, Gonwouo, Greenbaum, Gvoždík, Hirschfeld, Kouete, Chifundera, Lawson, McLaughlin, Zassi-Boulou, and Rödel, 2021, Ichthyol. & Herpetol., 109: 728–742, revised the genus and discussed a molecular tree, biogeographical hypothesis, and provided discussion that the synonymy of Cardioglossa with Astylosternus or Arthroleptis is not supported by the preponderance of evidence.
Contained taxa (18 sp.):
External links:
Please note: these links will take you to external websites not affiliated with the American Museum of Natural History. We are not responsible for their content.
- For access to general information see Wikipedia
- For additional sources of general information from other websites search Google
- For access to relevant technical literature search Google Scholar
- For images search CalPhoto Images and Google Images
- To search the NIH genetic sequence database, see GenBank
- For related information on conservation and images as well as observations see iNaturalist