- What is Amphibian Species of the World?
- How to cite
- How to use
- Structure of the taxonomic records
- Running log of additions and corrections, 2024
- Logs of changes and additions, 2014–2023
- What is the right name?
- Curator's blog
- Amphibian Species of the World on social media
- History of the project, 1980 to 2024
- Comments on amphibian taxonomy relating to versions 3.0 to 6.2 (2004 to 2024)
- Scientific Nomenclature and its Discontents: Comments by Frost on Rules and Philosophy of Taxonomy, Ranks, and Their Applications
- Contributors, online editions
- Contributors and reviewers for Amphibian Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (1985)
- Versions
- Museum abbreviations
- Links to useful amphibian systematic, conservation, collection management, informational, and/or regional sites
- Links to useful FREE library sites
- Copyright and terms of use
Hyloscirtus Peters, 1882
Hyloscirtus Peters, 1882, Sitzungsber. Ges. Naturforsch. Freunde Berlin, 1882: 127. Replacement name for Hylonomus Peters, 1882.
Hylonomus Peters, 1882, Sitzungsber. Ges. Naturforsch. Freunde Berlin, 1882: 107. Type species: Hylonomus bogotensis Peters, 1882, by monotypy. Primary homonym of Hylonomus Dawson, 1860 = Amphibia.
Colomascirtus Duellman, Marion, and Hedges, 2016, Zootaxa, 4104: 30. Type species: Hyla larinopygion Duellman, 1973. Synonymy by Rojas-Runjaic, Infante-Rivero, Salerno, and Meza-Joya, 2018, Zootaxa, 4382: 121. See comment.
Common Names
None noted.
Distribution
Central Costa Rica in wet forest to eastern and western slopes of the Andes in Colombia and Ecuador and in interandean valleys and western slopes of the Andes and Amazonian drainage of Venezuela, Colombia, Ecuador, Peru, and Bolivia.
Comment
Faivovich, Haddad, Garcia, Frost, Campbell, and Wheeler, 2005, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., 294: 84, resurrected Hyloscirtus from the synonymy of Hyla (where it was placed by Duellman, 1970, Monogr. Mus. Nat. Hist. Univ. Kansas: 327), for all species formerly placed in the Hyla armata group, Hyla bogotensis group, and Hyla larinopygion group (which Faivovich, Haddad, Garcia, Frost, Campbell, and Wheeler, 2005, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., 294: 84, continued to recognize within Hyloscirtus pending evaluation of their status). In Cophomantini of Faivovich, Haddad, Garcia, Frost, Campbell, and Wheeler, 2005, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., 294: 75. Duellman, 1972, Occas. Pap. Mus. Nat. Hist. Univ. Kansas, 11: 1–31, revised the Hyla bogotensis group. Duellman and Hillis, 1990, Occas. Pap. Mus. Nat. Hist. Univ. Kansas, 134: 1–23, reviewed the systematics of the Hyla larinopygion group. Duellman and Coloma, 1993, Occas. Pap. Mus. Nat. Hist. Univ. Kansas, 161: 1–11, supplied a key to the Hyla larinopygion group of Ecuador. Kizirian, Coloma, and Paredes-Recalde, 2003, Herpetologica, 59: 348, noted that the Hyla larinopygion group cannot be diagnosed as monophyletic without including Hyla armata. Duellman, De la Riva, and Wild, 1997, Sci. Pap. Nat. Hist. Mus. Univ. Kansas, 3: 1–41, provided some relevant discussion of the Andean groups. Faivovich and De la Riva, 2006, Copeia, 2006: 785–791, suggested that the Hyloscirtus armatus group might render paraphyletic the Hyloscirtus bogotensis group. Sánchez, 2010, Copeia, 2010: 351–363, delimited two species groups based on larval morphology. Coloma, Carvajal-Endara, Dueñas, Paredes-Recalde, Morales-Mite, Almeida-Reinoso, Tapia, Hutter, Toral-Contreras, and Guayasamin, 2012, Zootaxa, 3364: 1–78, reviewed the Hyloscirtus larinopygion group. Rivera-Correa and Faivovich, 2013, Herpetologica, 69 : 298–313, redelimited and rediagnosed the Hyloscirtus larinopygion group. Almendáriz C., Brito-M., Batallas-Revelo, and Ron, 2014, Pap. Avulsos Zool., São Paulo, 54: 33–49, reported on molecular phylogenetics of the genus. Guayasamin, Rivera-Correa, Arteaga-Navarro, Culebras, Bustamante, Pyron, Peñafiel, Morochz, and Hutter, 2015, Neotropical Biodiversity, 1: 2–21, reported on a maximum-likeihood analysis of static-aligned molecular data. Rivera-Correa, García-Burneo, and Grant, 2016, Zootaxa, 4061: 29–40, commented on the state of phylogenetic inquiry in the genus. Ron, Caminer, Varela-Jaramillo, and Almeida-Reinoso, 2018, ZooKeys, 809: 97–105, discussed the molecular phylogenetics and biogeography of the species within the genus. Dubois, Ohler, and Pyron, 2021, Megataxa, 5: 439, recognized Colomascirtus as the sister taxon of Hyloscirtus, but because they did not include Hyloscirtus jahni in their analysis (the species that rendered Hyloscirtus paraphyletic with respect to Colomascirtus according to Rojas-Runjaic, Infante-Rivero, Salerno, and Meza-Joya, 2018, Zootaxa, 4382: 121, the proposition of Hyloscirtus monophyly was not adequately tested. Yánez-Muñoz, Reyes-Puig, Batallas-Revelo, Broaddus, Urgilés-Merchán, Cisneros-Heredia, and Guayasamin, 2021, PeerJ, 9 (e11914): 1–33, provided a 16S mtDNA tree for the Hyloscirtus bogotensis group. Reyes-Puig, Recalde, Recalde, Koch, Guayasamin, Cisneros-Heredia, Jost, and Yánez-Muñoz, 2022, PeerJ, 10 (e14066): 1–34, provided dot maps of the species of Ecuador and Colombia as well as a 16S mtDNA tree of the Hyloscirtus larinopygion group of species. MTDNA tree provided by Rivera-Correa, Ron, Nunes, Araujo-Vieira, Pinheiro, and Grant, 2024, Zootaxa, 5474: 105.
Contained taxa (41 sp.):
External links:
Please note: these links will take you to external websites not affiliated with the American Museum of Natural History. We are not responsible for their content.
- For access to general information see Wikipedia
- For additional sources of general information from other websites search Google
- For access to relevant technical literature search Google Scholar
- For images search CalPhoto Images and Google Images
- To search the NIH genetic sequence database, see GenBank
- For related information on conservation and images as well as observations see iNaturalist