- What is Amphibian Species of the World?
- How to cite
- How to use
- Structure of the taxonomic records
- Running log of additions and corrections, 2024
- Logs of changes and additions, 2014–2023
- What is the right name?
- Curator's blog
- Amphibian Species of the World on social media
- History of the project, 1980 to 2024
- Comments on amphibian taxonomy relating to versions 3.0 to 6.2 (2004 to 2024)
- Scientific Nomenclature and its Discontents: Comments by Frost on Rules and Philosophy of Taxonomy, Ranks, and Their Applications
- Contributors, online editions
- Contributors and reviewers for Amphibian Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (1985)
- Versions
- Museum abbreviations
- Links to useful amphibian systematic, conservation, collection management, informational, and/or regional sites
- Links to useful FREE library sites
- Copyright and terms of use
Arthroleptis Smith, 1849
Arthroleptis Smith, 1849, Illust. Zool. S. Afr., 3 (Appendix): 24. Type species: Arthroleptis wahlbergii Smith, 1849, by monotypy.
Schoutedenella De Witte, 1921, Rev. Zool. Afr., 9: 19. Type species: Schoutedenella globosa De Witte, 1921, by monotypy. Synonymy by Loveridge, 1957, Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool., 117: 350; Schmidt and Inger, 1959, Explor. Parc Natl. Upemba, Miss. G.F. de Witte, 56: 123; Poynton, 1964, Ann. Natal Mus., 17: 159; Poynton, 1976, Rev. Zool. Bot. Afr., 90: 215–220; Poynton and Broadley, 1985, Ann. Natal Mus., 26: 535–536; and Frost, Grant, Faivovich, Bain, Haas, Haddad, de Sá, Channing, Wilkinson, Donnellan, Raxworthy, Campbell, Blotto, Moler, Drewes, Nussbaum, Lynch, Green, and Wheeler, 2006, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., 297: 336.
Abroscaphus Laurent, 1941 "1940", Rev. Zool. Bot. Afr., 34: 82. Type species: Arthroleptis adolfifriederici Nieden, 1911 "1910", by original designation. Proposed as a subgenus of Arthroleptis. Distinctiveness from Arthroleptis sensu stricto rejected by Laurent, 1961, Publ. Univ. Elisabethville, 1: 201.
Coracodichus Laurent, 1941 "1940", Rev. Zool. Bot. Afr., 34: 85. Type species: Arthroleptis whytii Boulenger, 1897, by original designation. Proposed as a subgenus of Arthroleptis, although not generally accepted by subsequent authors.
Arthroleptulus Laurent, 1941 "1940", Rev. Zool. Bot. Afr., 34: 87. Type species: Arthroleptis xenodactylus Boulenger, 1909, by subsequent designation of Dubois, 1981, Monit. Zool. Ital., N.S., Suppl., 15: 260. Proposed as a subgenus of Arthroleptis.
Common Names
Squeaking Frogs (Broadley, 1971, Puku, 6: 118).
Humus Frogs (Van Dijk, 1978, J. Herpetol. Assoc. Afr., 17: 16).
Squeakers (Passmore and Carruthers, 1979, S. Afr. Frogs: 204; Channing, 2001, Amph. Cent. S. Afr.: 41; Du Preez and Carruthers, 2009, Compl. Guide Frogs S. Afr.: 80).
Bush Squeakers (Ananjeva, Borkin, Darevsky, and Orlov, 1988, Dict. Amph. Rept. Five Languages: 112).
Screeching Frogs (Frank and Ramus, 1995, Compl. Guide Scient. Common Names Amph. Rept. World: 36).
Distribution
Tropical Africa.
Comment
In Arthroleptini of Frost, Grant, Faivovich, Bain, Haas, Haddad, de Sá, Channing, Wilkinson, Donnellan, Raxworthy, Campbell, Blotto, Moler, Drewes, Nussbaum, Lynch, Green, and Wheeler, 2006, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., 297: 234. Laurent, 1954, Ann. Mus. R. Congo Belge, Tervuren, Ser. Quarto, Sci. Zool., 1: 34, modified de Witte's original diagnosis of Schoutedenella to include a number of species formerly included within Arthroleptis. Subsequent authors (e.g., Loveridge, 1957, Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool., 117: 350; Schmidt and Inger, 1959, Explor. Parc Natl. Upemba, Miss. G.F. de Witte, 56: 123; and Poynton, 1964, Ann. Natal Mus., 17: 159, Poynton, 1976, Rev. Zool. Bot. Afr., 90: 215–220, Poynton and Broadley, 1985, Ann. Natal Mus., 26: 535–536, and Poynton, 2003, Afr. J. Herpetol., 52: 49–51) considered Schoutedenella to be synonymous with Arthroleptis. Laurent, 1961, Publ. Univ. Elisabethville, 1: 200, and Laurent, 1973, Rev. Zool. Bot. Afr., 87: 666–678, maintained that Schoutedenella (sensu Laurent, not de Witte) was valid, noting that to merge Schoutedenella with Arthroleptis would make Arthroleptis paraphyletic, inasmuch as he posited that Schoutedenella is more closely related to Cardioglossa than to Arthroleptis. Nevertheless, molecular evidence suggests strongly that Schoutedenella is paraphyletic with respect to Arthroleptis, and on this basis Frost, Grant, Faivovich, Bain, Haas, Haddad, de Sá, Channing, Wilkinson, Donnellan, Raxworthy, Campbell, Blotto, Moler, Drewes, Nussbaum, Lynch, Green, and Wheeler, 2006, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., 297: 234, placed Schoutedenella in the synonymy of Arthroleptis. Channing, 2001, Amph. Cent. S. Afr.: 49–55, provided a key and accounts for the species of southern and central Africa. Zimkus and Blackburn, 2008, Breviora, 513: 1–12, discussed the identification of Arthroleptis with respect to Phrynobatrachus (Phrynobatrachidae) and provided a morphological data matrix for the species of Arthroleptis. Blackburn, 2008, Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 49: 806–826, discussed mtDNA phylogenetics of the taxon. Du Preez and Carruthers, 2009, Compl. Guide Frogs S. Afr.: 80–87, provided brief accounts and keys to the species of southern Africa. Mercurio, 2011, Amph. Malawi: 75–93, provided accounts and an identification key for Malawi. Schweiger, Naumann, Larson, Möckel, and Müller, 2017, Organisms Divers. Evol., 17: 694–707, discussed and described the direct development found in this taxon. Rödel and Glos, 2019, Zoosyst. Evol., 95: 18, reported possibly unnamed species from the Krahn-Basa Proposed Protected Area in southeastern Liberia and the Foya Proposed Protected Area in western Liberia. Channing and Rödel, 2019, Field Guide Frogs & Other Amph. Afr.: 254–269, provided brief accounts, photographs, and range maps for the species. Bittencourt-Silva, Bayliss, and Conradie, 2020, Amph. Rept. Conserv., 14 (2: e247): 198–271, reported a possibly new species from Mount Lico, Ile District, Zambesia Province, northeast-central Mozambique.
Contained taxa (49 sp.):
External links:
Please note: these links will take you to external websites not affiliated with the American Museum of Natural History. We are not responsible for their content.
- For access to general information see Wikipedia
- For additional sources of general information from other websites search Google
- For access to relevant technical literature search Google Scholar
- For images search CalPhoto Images and Google Images
- To search the NIH genetic sequence database, see GenBank
- For related information on conservation and images as well as observations see iNaturalist