- What is Amphibian Species of the World?
- How to cite
- How to use
- Structure of the taxonomic records
- Running log of additions and changes, 2025
- Logs of changes and additions, 2014–2024
- What is the right name?
- Curator's blog
- History of the project, 1980 to 2024
- Comments on amphibian taxonomy relating to versions 3.0 to 6.2 (2004 to 2024)
- Scientific Nomenclature and its Discontents: Comments by Frost on Rules and Philosophy of Taxonomy, Ranks, and Their Applications
- Contributors, online editions
- Contributors and reviewers for Amphibian Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (1985)
- Versions
- Museum abbreviations
- Links to useful amphibian systematic, conservation, collection management, informational, and/or regional sites
- Links to useful FREE library sites
- Copyright and terms of use
Oreophryne Boettger, 1895
Oreophryne Boettger, 1895, Zool. Anz., 18: 135. Type species: Oreophryne senckenbergiana Boettger, 1895 (= Microhyla achatina var. moluccensis Peters and Doria, 1878), by monotypy. Placed on Official List of Generic Names in Zoology by Opinion 1266, Anonymous, 1984, Bull. Zool. Nomencl., 41: 12.
Mehelyia Wandolleck, 1911 "1910", Abh. Ber. Zool. Anthropol. Ethnograph. Mus. Dresden, 13: 7. Type species: Meheylia lineata Wandolleck, 1911 (= Sphenophryne biroi Méhely, 1897), by subsequent designation of Parker, 1934, Monogr. Frogs Fam. Microhylidae: 159. Synonymy by Nieden, 1926, Das Tierreich, 49: 38; Parker, 1934, Monogr. Frogs Fam. Microhylidae: 159.
Common Names
Cross Frogs (Frank and Ramus, 1995, Compl. Guide Scient. Common Names Amph. Rept. World: 91).
Distribution
Southern Philippine Islands, Sulwesi, and the Lesser Sunda Islands to New Guinea and New Britain.
Comment
See comment under Cophixalus. Placed on the Official List of Generic Names in Zoology by the International Commission of Zoological Nomenclature, 1984, Opinion 1266, Anonymous, 1984, Bull. Zool. Nomencl., 41: 12–14. Köhler and Günther, 2008, Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 47: 353–365, suggested on the basis of molecular evidence that this taxon is monophyletic and the sister taxon of a taxon composed of a piece of "Cophixalus" (see comment under Cophixalus) and Barygenys. Pyron and Wiens, 2011, Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 61: 543–583, in their molecular study, found Cophixalus balbus imbedded within this taxon. Wanger, Motzke, Saleh, and Iskandar, 2011, Salamandra, 47: 17–29, reported two unnamed species from central Sulawesi, Indonesia. Rivera, Kraus, Allison, and Butler, 2017, Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 112: 1–11, questioned the monophyly of this taxon.; Tu, Yang, Liang, and Zhang, 2018, Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 126: 87, provided a molecular tree that suggested that Oreophryne is composed of three phylogenetic units: (1) Oreophryne anulata, Oreophryne pseudasplenicola, and Oreophryne asplenicola, which forms the sister taxon of remaining asterophrynines with the exception of Gastrophrynoides; (2) a group composed of Oreophryne wapoga and Oreophryne atrigularis, which is imbedded in Cophixalus; and (3) a group containing the bulk of the rest of the species which is paraphyletic with respect to Paedophryne and Aphantophryne. Dubois, Ohler, and Pyron, 2021, Megataxa, 5: 418, 521, placed Oreophryne into the synonymy of Asterophrys due to the chaotic nature of so many of the nominal genera in this subfamily. Nevertheless, it seems that a better solution is not to move 343 species temporarily into one genus, but to wait, at least for a while, to see if anyone is attempting to resolve the problem. But, given the amount of talking I've heard about resolving the "Litoria" problem with no clear progress, I suspect that in a year I will be making this wholesale change.
Contained taxa (73 sp.):
External links:
Please note: these links will take you to external websites not affiliated with the American Museum of Natural History. We are not responsible for their content.
- For access to general information see Wikipedia
- For additional sources of general information from other websites search Google
- For access to relevant technical literature search Google Scholar
- For images search CalPhoto Images and Google Images
- To search the NIH genetic sequence database, see GenBank
- For related information on conservation and images as well as observations see iNaturalist