- What is Amphibian Species of the World?
- How to cite
- How to use
- Structure of the taxonomic records
- Running log of additions and corrections, 2024
- Logs of changes and additions, 2014–2023
- What is the right name?
- Curator's blog
- History of the project, 1980 to 2024
- Comments on amphibian taxonomy relating to versions 3.0 to 6.2 (2004 to 2024)
- Scientific Nomenclature and its Discontents: Comments by Frost on Rules and Philosophy of Taxonomy, Ranks, and Their Applications
- Contributors, online editions
- Contributors and reviewers for Amphibian Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (1985)
- Versions
- Museum abbreviations
- Links to useful amphibian systematic, conservation, collection management, informational, and/or regional sites
- Links to useful FREE library sites
- Copyright and terms of use
Incilius Cope, 1863
Incilius Cope, 1863, Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia, 15: 50. Type species: Bufo coniferus Cope, 1862, by subsequent designation of Kellogg, 1932, Bull. U.S. Natl. Mus., 160: 29; the designation of Bufo cognatus Say, 1823, as type species by Frost, Grant, Faivovich, Bain, Haas, Haddad, de Sá, Channing, Wilkinson, Donnellan, Raxworthy, Campbell, Blotto, Moler, Drewes, Nussbaum, Lynch, Green, and Wheeler, 2006, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., 297: 222, is in error, according to Frost, Mendelson, and Pramuk, 2009, Copeia, 2009: 418–419.
Cranopsis Cope, 1875 "1876", J. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia, Ser. 2, 8: 96. Type species: Cranopsis fastidiosus Cope, 1875 "1876", by monotypy. Junior homonym of Cranopsis Adams, 1860 (Mollusca) and Cranopsis Dall, 1871 (Brachiopoda). Synonymy by Frost, Mendelson, and Pramuk, 2009, Copeia, 2009: 418-419.
Ollotis Cope, 1875 "1876", J. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia, Ser. 2, 8: 98. Type species: Ollotis coerulescens Cope, 1875, by monotypy. Synonymy by Frost, Mendelson, and Pramuk, 2009, Copeia, 2009: 418-419.
Crepidius Cope, 1875 "1876", J. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia, Ser. 2, 8: 97. Type species: Crepidius epioticus Cope, 1875, by monotypy. Primary homonym of Crepidius Candeze, 1859 (Coleoptera).
Crepidophryne Cope, 1889, Bull. U.S. Natl. Mus., 34: 260. Replacement name for Crepidius Cope 1875 "1876". Synonymy with Incilius by Mendelson, Mulcahy, Williams, and Sites, 2011, Zootaxa, 3138: 19.
Cranophryne Cope, 1889, Bull. U.S. Natl. Mus., 34: 20. Replacement name for Cranopsis Cope, 1875 "1876".
Common Names
Central American Toads (Frost, McDiarmid, and Mendelson, 2008, in Crother (ed.), Herpetol. Circ., 37: 9; Liner and Casas-Andreu, 2008, Herpetol. Circ., 38: 17; Frost, McDiarmid, Mendelson, and Green, 2012, in Crother (ed.), Herpetol. Circ., 39: 16; Frost, Lemmon, McDiarmid, and Mendelson, 2017, in Crother (ed.), Herpetol. Circ., 43: 12).
Middle American Toads (Collins and Taggart, 2009, Standard Common Curr. Sci. Names N. Am. Amph. Turtles Rept. Crocodil., ed. 6: 6).
Cerro Utyum Toads (Crepidophryne [no longer recognized]: Frank and Ramus, 1995, Compl. Guide Scient. Common Names Amph. Rept. World: 44).
Distribution
Southern USA south to Panama and then south along the Pacific versant to Ecuador.
Comment
Köhler, 2011, Amph. Cent. Am.: 104–115, compared this genus (as Incilius and Crepidophryne) to others in Central America, provided a brief summary of natural history, identification keys, range maps, and photographs. Fouquette and Dubois, 2014, Checklist N.A. Amph. Rept.: 313, considered Incilius a subgenus of Bufo, cherry-picking their citation to literature (excluding any reference to Van Bocxlaer, Biju, Loader, and Bossuyt, 2009, BMC Evol. Biol., 9 (e131): 1–10, Van Bocxlaer, Loader, Roelants, Biju, Menegon, and Bossuyt, 2010, Science, 327: 679–682, or Pyron and Wiens, 2011, Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 61: 543–583, which provided results not congruent with the story that Fouquette and Dubois wanted to tell) to avoid recognizing that treating this genus as a subgenus of Bufo also requires under current understanding of phylogeny all Old-World bufonids, such as Sabahphrynus, Nectophryne, and Ansonia to be treated as subgenera of Bufo as well. Van Bocxlaer, Biju, Loader, and Bossuyt, 2009, BMC Evol. Biol., 9 (e131): 1–10, did not confirm a monophyletic Incilius, Incilius bocourti in their analysis possibly forming the sister taxon of Anaxyrus. Mendelson, Mulcahy, Williams, and Sites, 2011, Zootaxa, 3138: 1–34, with additional data and denser sampling did recover a monophyletic Incilius. Firneno, O'Neill, Portik, Emery, Townsend, and Fujita, 2020, Mol. Ecol., 29: 3543–3559, discussed incomplete lineage sorting and mtDNA/nuDNA discordance in the Incilius coccifer complex (Incilius coccifer, Incilius porteri, and Incilius ibarrai). See also Streicher and Day, 2020, Mol. Ecol., 29: 3400–3402, who commented on that paper and the issues it raised.
Contained taxa (39 sp.):
External links:
Please note: these links will take you to external websites not affiliated with the American Museum of Natural History. We are not responsible for their content.
- For access to general information see Wikipedia
- For additional sources of general information from other websites search Google
- For access to relevant technical literature search Google Scholar
- For images search CalPhoto Images and Google Images
- To search the NIH genetic sequence database, see GenBank
- For related information on conservation and images as well as observations see iNaturalist